SCHF vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from Charles Schwab - SCHF tracks the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index while FNDF tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHF returned 10.82%/yr vs 12.17%/yr for FNDF. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCHF charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

SCHF vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 13.98% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 16.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHF has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 10.82%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.17% annualized return.

SCHF

• 1D: -3.15%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 13.98%
• 6M: 13.74%
• 1Y: 31.16%
• 3Y*: 19.61%
• 5Y*: 9.76%
• 10Y*: 10.82%

FNDF

• 1D: -2.61%
• 1M: -1.37%
• YTD: 16.43%
• 6M: 16.74%
• 1Y: 39.04%
• 3Y*: 22.45%
• 5Y*: 12.99%
• 10Y*: 12.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHF vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	13.98%	34.55%	3.28%	18.35%	-14.80%	11.40%	9.48%	22.26%	-14.29%	26.03%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	16.43%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHF and FNDF is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013	0.97

The correlation between SCHF and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHF vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHF	FNDF
Financial Services	23.3%	16.2%
Industrials	18.1%	15.5%
Technology	17.6%	14.4%
Basic Materials	7.4%	11.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	10.8%
Healthcare	7.0%	5.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.7%	6.5%
Energy	4.7%	10.9%
Communication Services	3.6%	4.9%
Utilities	3.2%	3.5%
Real Estate	2.0%	0.8%

Return for Risk

SCHF vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHF

SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 57
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 60

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 76
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHF vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCHF	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	2.43	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	3.16	-0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.44	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	3.70	-0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.46	13.74	-3.27

SCHF vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHF Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHF and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCHF vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHF	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.87%	-40.14%	+5.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.48%	-10.60%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.41%	-13.89%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.14%	-25.56%	-3.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.87%	-40.14%	+5.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.15%	-4.59%	+1.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.36%	-7.62%	+0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	2.85%	+0.14%

Volatility

SCHF vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a higher volatility of 7.22% compared to Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) at 6.77%. This indicates that SCHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHF	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.22%	6.77%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.80%	13.93%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.92%	16.16%	+0.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.61%	16.36%	+0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.05%	17.47%	-0.42%

SCHF vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCHF vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than FNDF's 2.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	2.95%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF	3.00%	3.42%	3.26%	2.97%	2.80%	3.19%	2.08%	2.95%	3.06%	2.35%	2.58%	2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHF and FNDF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, SCHF and FNDF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SCHF or FNDF?

SCHF has higher volatility (7.22%) compared to FNDF (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, SCHF or FNDF?

On 10-year performance, FNDF leads with 12.17% vs 10.82% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, FNDF has been the lower-risk option at 6.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHF or FNDF?

Over the 10-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 12.17% return vs 10.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHF or FNDF?

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHF or FNDF?

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 2.95% for FNDF.

What is the main difference between SCHF and FNDF?

SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.25% for FNDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.