SCHF vs. FNDF
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF).
SCHF and FNDF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009. FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both SCHF and FNDF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCHF or FNDF.
Key characteristics
| SCHF | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.90% | 3.71% |
| 1Y Return | 9.66% | 12.66% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.10% | 5.52% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.49% | 7.74% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.59% | 4.81% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.89 | 1.14 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.44% | 12.37% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.87% | -40.14% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.76% | -2.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHF and FNDF is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SCHF vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 3.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHF having a 4.59% annualized return and FNDF not far ahead at 4.81%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHF vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCHF vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCHF vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than FNDF's 3.29% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% | 2.90% | 2.21% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.29% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% | 1.84% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
SCHF vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and FNDF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCHF vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) have volatilities of 3.41% and 3.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.