SCC vs. NOBL
SCC (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCC is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the DJ Global United States (All) / Consumer Services -IND (-200%), while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCC returned -24.58%/yr vs 9.86%/yr for NOBL. Their -0.56 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SCC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
SCC vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCC achieves a 3.71% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 10.84% return. Over the past 10 years, SCC has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of -24.58%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.86% annualized return.
SCC
- 1D
- -6.23%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 6.70%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 1Y
- -15.16%
- 3Y*
- -20.88%
- 5Y*
- -14.68%
- 10Y*
- -24.58%
- ALL TIME*
- -25.78%
NOBL
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 1Y
- 15.41%
- 3Y*
- 8.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $66.40M | $66.46M | $60.79M | |
| $353.66K | $227.58K | $240.11K |
SCC vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 3.71% | -18.97% | -36.01% | -44.34% | 64.09% | -25.84% | -54.75% | -38.94% | -8.53% | -31.58% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 10.84% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCC and NOBL is -0.41, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2013 | -0.56 |
The correlation between SCC and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from -0.61 (5 years) to -0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCC vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
SCC
NOBL
SCC vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCC | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.21 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 1.62 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 4.10 | -4.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCC vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCC drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCC and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCC | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -35.43% | -64.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.54% | -9.11% | -16.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.10% | -15.36% | -51.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.34% | -17.92% | -59.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.14% | -35.43% | -59.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.90% | -2.31% | -97.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.05% | -3.46% | -82.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.80% | 3.59% | +13.21% |
Volatility
SCC vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (SCC) has a higher volatility of 13.88% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 5.07%. This indicates that SCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCC | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.88% | 5.07% | +8.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.01% | 9.11% | +20.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.04% | 11.92% | +27.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.54% | 14.48% | +30.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.67% | 16.63% | +23.04% |
SCC vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCC vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
SCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than NOBL's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.04% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services | 3.46% | 4.87% | 7.46% | 4.53% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 2.67% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCC and NOBL have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCC has higher volatility (13.88%) compared to NOBL (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCC dropped -99.92% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.86% vs -24.58% for SCC. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.86% return vs -24.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SCC.
SCC has the higher dividend yield at 3.46%, compared with 2.04% for NOBL.
SCC is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NOBL is Dividend. SCC tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Consumer Services -IND (-200%), while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SCC and 0.35% for NOBL.
NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCC and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer