SBTU vs. CIFG
SBTU (T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF) and CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SBTU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CIFG.
Performance
SBTU vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBTU achieves a -72.45% return, which is significantly lower than CIFG's -26.74% return.
SBTU
- 1D
- -10.13%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- 6M
- -79.40%
- YTD
- -72.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFG
- 1D
- -21.93%
- 1M
- -59.11%
- 6M
- -46.89%
- YTD
- -26.74%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBTU vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SBTU T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF | -72.45% | -47.31% |
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | -26.74% | -32.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBTU and CIFG is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBTU vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBTU vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBTU drawdown since its inception was -94.22%, which is greater than CIFG's maximum drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBTU and CIFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBTU | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.22% | -71.71% | -22.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.01% | -66.62% | -24.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.86% | -36.36% | -35.50% |
Volatility
SBTU vs. CIFG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBTU | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 159.58% | 206.17% | -46.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 159.58% | 206.17% | -46.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 159.58% | 206.17% | -46.59% |
SBTU vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBTU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBTU vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison
Neither SBTU nor CIFG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SBTU and CIFG have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SBTU.
SBTU and CIFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tuttle Capital Management and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SBTU and 0.75% for CIFG.
Find the right allocation for SBTU and CIFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer