SBTU vs. BEX
SBTU (T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF) and BEX (Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SBTU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for BEX.
Performance
SBTU vs. BEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SBTU
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -30.51%
- YTD
- -75.55%
- 6M
- -78.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEX
- 1D
- 9.79%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBTU vs. BEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SBTU T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF | -30.51% |
BEX Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 10.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBTU and BEX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBTU vs. BEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU) and Tradr 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBTU vs. BEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBTU drawdown since its inception was -92.38%, which is greater than BEX's maximum drawdown of -47.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBTU and BEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBTU | BEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.38% | -47.06% | -45.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.02% | 0.00% | -92.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.79% | -22.48% | -47.31% |
Volatility
SBTU vs. BEX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBTU | BEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 160.23% | 203.63% | -43.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 160.23% | 203.63% | -43.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 160.23% | 203.63% | -43.40% |
SBTU vs. BEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBTU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BEX's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBTU vs. BEX - Dividend Comparison
Neither SBTU nor BEX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SBTU and BEX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BEX is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEX is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SBTU.
SBTU and BEX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tuttle Capital Management and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SBTU and 1.30% for BEX.
Find the right allocation for SBTU and BEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer