PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBTU vs. MSTK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBTU vs. MSTK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU) and Tuttle Capital MSTR 0DTE Covered Call ETF (MSTK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SBTU

1D
0.00%
1M
-30.51%
YTD
-75.55%
6M
-78.80%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSTK

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBTU vs. MSTK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SBTU and MSTK is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025

0.69

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBTU vs. MSTK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU) and Tuttle Capital MSTR 0DTE Covered Call ETF (MSTK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SBTU vs. MSTK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBTU vs. MSTK - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBTUMSTKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.79%

Volatility

SBTU vs. MSTK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBTUMSTKDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

160.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

160.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

160.23%

SBTU vs. MSTK - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBTU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTK's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBTU vs. MSTK - Dividend Comparison

SBTU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.03%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SBTU and MSTK have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MSTK is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSTK is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SBTU.

MSTK has the higher dividend yield at 49.03%, compared with 0.00% for SBTU.

SBTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MSTK is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for SBTU and 0.99% for MSTK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBTU and MSTK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer