PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBTU vs. CORD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBTU vs. CORD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBTU achieves a -75.55% return, which is significantly higher than CORD's -88.71% return.


SBTU

1D
0.00%
1M
-30.51%
YTD
-75.55%
6M
-78.80%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CORD

1D
11.26%
1M
-24.83%
YTD
-88.71%
6M
-84.44%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBTU vs. CORD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SBTU
T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF
-75.55%-67.09%
CORD
T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF
-88.71%81.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SBTU and CORD is -0.53, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2025

-0.53

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBTU vs. CORD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long SBET Daily Target ETF (SBTU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SBTU vs. CORD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBTU vs. CORD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBTU drawdown since its inception was -92.38%, roughly equal to the maximum CORD drawdown of -93.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBTU and CORD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBTUCORDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.38%

-93.69%

+1.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.02%

-92.63%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.79%

-58.30%

-11.49%

Volatility

SBTU vs. CORD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBTUCORDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

160.23%

185.44%

-25.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

160.23%

185.44%

-25.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

160.23%

185.44%

-25.21%

SBTU vs. CORD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SBTU and CORD have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

SBTU vs. CORD - Dividend Comparison

Neither SBTU nor CORD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SBTU and CORD have a correlation of -0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SBTU and CORD have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

SBTU and CORD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SBTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while CORD is Inverse Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBTU and CORD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer