PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBIT vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SBIT vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SBIT vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
31.57%-25.11%-73.13%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.32%6.84%1.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBIT achieves a 31.57% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 2.32% return.


SBIT

1D
-1.03%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
31.57%
6M
111.14%
1Y
-5.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NOBL

1D
-0.04%
1M
-6.79%
YTD
2.32%
6M
4.06%
1Y
6.18%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SBIT vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBIT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SBIT vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBIT
SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBIT vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBITNOBLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.06

0.41

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.57

0.70

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.09

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

0.54

-0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.24

1.89

-2.13

SBIT vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBIT Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBIT and NOBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBITNOBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

0.41

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.49

0.64

-1.13

Correlation

The correlation between SBIT and NOBL is -0.20. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

SBIT vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than NOBL's 2.14% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBIT
Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF
3.42%0.52%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.14%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Drawdowns

SBIT vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBIT drawdown since its inception was -91.35%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBIT and NOBL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SBITNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.35%

-35.43%

-55.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.11%

-11.20%

-55.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.12%

-7.07%

-72.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.28%

-3.45%

-63.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

47.12%

3.18%

+43.94%

Volatility

SBIT vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a higher volatility of 26.24% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.55%. This indicates that SBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SBITNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.24%

3.55%

+22.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

72.98%

8.06%

+64.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.40%

15.24%

+75.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

99.58%

14.39%

+85.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

99.58%

16.59%

+82.99%