SBFAX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
SBFAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Nov 16, 1998. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
SBFAX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SBFAX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBFAX 1919 Financial Services Fund | -6.51% | 4.29% | 24.86% | 1.50% | -13.99% | 30.74% | 0.14% | 29.11% | -14.94% | 14.65% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -0.70% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBFAX achieves a -6.51% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's -0.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SBFAX having a 8.60% annualized return and FASGX not far ahead at 8.96%.
SBFAX
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -3.96%
- YTD
- -6.51%
- 6M
- -5.56%
- 1Y
- -3.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.91%
- 5Y*
- 2.95%
- 10Y*
- 8.60%
FASGX
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SBFAX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBFAX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SBFAX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
SBFAX
FASGX
SBFAX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBFAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | 1.41 | -1.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | 2.01 | -2.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.30 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 2.00 | -2.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | 8.74 | -9.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBFAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | 1.41 | -1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.55 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.71 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.60 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between SBFAX and FASGX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SBFAX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
SBFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.52%, more than FASGX's 7.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBFAX 1919 Financial Services Fund | 15.52% | 14.51% | 10.60% | 10.93% | 2.40% | 4.83% | 5.09% | 3.84% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 2.93% | 7.25% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.39% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
SBFAX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBFAX drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, roughly equal to the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBFAX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBFAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.33% | -47.35% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.95% | -9.07% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.94% | -23.54% | -10.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.58% | -27.20% | -16.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.34% | -5.77% | -3.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.53% | -6.74% | -2.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.57% | 2.07% | +2.50% |
Volatility
SBFAX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) is 4.12%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that SBFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SBFAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 5.30% | -1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 8.12% | +2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.20% | 13.00% | +5.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 12.18% | +7.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.85% | 12.58% | +10.27% |