SBFAX vs. RMBKX
Compare and contrast key facts about 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) and RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX).
SBFAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Nov 16, 1998. RMBKX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 7, 1999.
Performance
SBFAX vs. RMBKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SBFAX vs. RMBKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBFAX 1919 Financial Services Fund | -8.02% | 4.29% | 24.86% | 1.50% | -13.99% | 30.74% | 0.14% | 29.11% | -14.94% | 14.65% |
RMBKX RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund | -0.36% | 12.84% | 17.07% | 4.56% | -19.18% | 56.40% | -5.73% | 22.82% | -17.13% | 12.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBFAX achieves a -8.02% return, which is significantly lower than RMBKX's -0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, SBFAX has underperformed RMBKX with an annualized return of 8.43%, while RMBKX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.85% annualized return.
SBFAX
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -5.19%
- YTD
- -8.02%
- 6M
- -7.76%
- 1Y
- -5.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.30%
- 5Y*
- 2.86%
- 10Y*
- 8.43%
RMBKX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 19.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SBFAX vs. RMBKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBFAX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than RMBKX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SBFAX vs. RMBKX — Risk / Return Rank
SBFAX
RMBKX
SBFAX vs. RMBKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) and RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBFAX | RMBKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | 0.85 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | 1.28 | -1.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.17 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 1.48 | -2.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.39 | 4.29 | -5.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBFAX | RMBKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 | 0.85 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.24 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.36 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.48 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between SBFAX and RMBKX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SBFAX vs. RMBKX - Dividend Comparison
SBFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.77%, more than RMBKX's 6.24% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBFAX 1919 Financial Services Fund | 15.77% | 14.51% | 10.60% | 10.93% | 2.40% | 4.83% | 5.09% | 3.84% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 2.93% | 7.25% |
RMBKX RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund | 6.24% | 6.22% | 1.90% | 1.29% | 17.29% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 5.39% | 6.63% | 1.50% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SBFAX vs. RMBKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBFAX drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, smaller than the maximum RMBKX drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBFAX and RMBKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBFAX | RMBKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.33% | -55.45% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.95% | -12.67% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.94% | -44.33% | +10.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.58% | -55.45% | +11.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.80% | -8.06% | -2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.53% | -11.19% | +1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.54% | 4.38% | +0.16% |
Volatility
SBFAX vs. RMBKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) is 3.70%, while RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that SBFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMBKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SBFAX | RMBKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 4.82% | -1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.91% | 15.55% | -4.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 24.42% | -6.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 24.97% | -5.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.85% | 27.10% | -4.25% |