PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBFAX vs. HSFNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBFAX vs. HSFNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) and Hennessy Small Cap Financial Fund (HSFNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBFAX achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than HSFNX's 15.24% return. Over the past 10 years, SBFAX has underperformed HSFNX with an annualized return of 9.49%, while HSFNX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.11% annualized return.


SBFAX

1D
-1.79%
1M
1.93%
6M
6.67%
YTD
5.86%
1Y
10.63%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
5.56%
10Y*
9.49%
ALL TIME*
8.78%

HSFNX

1D
0.29%
1M
0.00%
6M
8.89%
YTD
15.24%
1Y
36.04%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
10.11%
ALL TIME*
4.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SBFAX vs. HSFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBFAX
1919 Financial Services Fund
5.86%4.29%24.86%1.50%-13.99%30.74%0.14%29.11%-14.94%14.65%
HSFNX
Hennessy Small Cap Financial Fund
15.24%12.79%10.76%4.64%-11.14%42.76%2.56%19.91%-15.88%-0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SBFAX and HSFNX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999

0.84

The correlation between SBFAX and HSFNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBFAX vs. HSFNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SBFAX
SBFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SBFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SBFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

HSFNX
HSFNX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HSFNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSFNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSFNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
HSFNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSFNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SBFAX vs. HSFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) and Hennessy Small Cap Financial Fund (HSFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBFAXHSFNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.25

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

2.36

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.66

6.31

-4.65

SBFAX vs. HSFNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBFAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the HSFNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBFAX and HSFNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBFAX vs. HSFNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBFAX drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, smaller than the maximum HSFNX drawdown of -70.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBFAX and HSFNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBFAXHSFNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.33%

-70.18%

+20.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-13.61%

+2.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.41%

-27.33%

+10.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.94%

-43.00%

+9.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.58%

-50.68%

+7.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-2.95%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

-25.88%

+16.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

5.08%

-0.33%

Volatility

SBFAX vs. HSFNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) is 4.96%, while Hennessy Small Cap Financial Fund (HSFNX) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that SBFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSFNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBFAXHSFNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

6.18%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.87%

15.38%

-4.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.80%

23.65%

-8.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.18%

27.23%

-8.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.75%

29.31%

-6.56%

SBFAX vs. HSFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBFAX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is lower than HSFNX's 1.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBFAX vs. HSFNX - Dividend Comparison

SBFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.70%, more than HSFNX's 9.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSFNX
Hennessy Small Cap Financial Fund
9.54%10.99%5.97%4.63%9.14%0.97%0.91%3.43%7.34%8.19%12.46%7.38%
SBFAX
1919 Financial Services Fund
13.70%14.51%10.60%10.93%2.40%4.83%5.09%3.84%1.58%0.00%2.93%7.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBFAX and HSFNX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HSFNX has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to SBFAX (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBFAX dropped -49.33% vs HSFNX's -70.18%.

HSFNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBFAX and HSFNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer