PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBFAX vs. RYFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBFAX vs. RYFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) and Rydex Financial Services Fund (RYFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBFAX achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than RYFIX's 6.19% return. Over the past 10 years, SBFAX has underperformed RYFIX with an annualized return of 9.49%, while RYFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.45% annualized return.


SBFAX

1D
-1.79%
1M
1.93%
6M
6.67%
YTD
5.86%
1Y
10.63%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
5.56%
10Y*
9.49%
ALL TIME*
8.78%

RYFIX

1D
0.18%
1M
2.17%
6M
6.66%
YTD
6.19%
1Y
10.79%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
10.45%
ALL TIME*
4.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SBFAX vs. RYFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBFAX
1919 Financial Services Fund
5.86%4.29%24.86%1.50%-13.99%30.74%0.14%29.11%-14.94%14.65%
RYFIX
Rydex Financial Services Fund
6.19%11.21%22.86%14.54%-18.03%35.83%0.27%28.32%-12.05%15.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SBFAX and RYFIX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999

0.91

The correlation between SBFAX and RYFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBFAX vs. RYFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SBFAX
SBFAX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
SBFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SBFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

RYFIX
RYFIX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
RYFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RYFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SBFAX vs. RYFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) and Rydex Financial Services Fund (RYFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBFAXRYFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.11

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

0.61

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.66

1.80

-0.13

SBFAX vs. RYFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBFAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is comparable to the RYFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBFAX and RYFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBFAX vs. RYFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBFAX drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, smaller than the maximum RYFIX drawdown of -77.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBFAX and RYFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBFAXRYFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.33%

-77.63%

+28.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-13.52%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.41%

-18.14%

+1.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.94%

-27.08%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.58%

-44.01%

+0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-1.01%

-1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

-18.30%

+8.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

4.59%

+0.16%

Volatility

SBFAX vs. RYFIX - Volatility Comparison

1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Rydex Financial Services Fund (RYFIX) at 4.19%. This indicates that SBFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBFAXRYFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

4.19%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.87%

10.91%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.80%

14.31%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.18%

18.44%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.75%

20.92%

+1.83%

SBFAX vs. RYFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SBFAX and RYFIX have an expense ratio of 1.36%.


Dividends

SBFAX vs. RYFIX - Dividend Comparison

SBFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.70%, more than RYFIX's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYFIX
Rydex Financial Services Fund
1.14%1.21%0.76%0.00%25.45%0.83%0.00%0.41%5.14%0.51%0.71%1.65%
SBFAX
1919 Financial Services Fund
13.70%14.51%10.60%10.93%2.40%4.83%5.09%3.84%1.58%0.00%2.93%7.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBFAX and RYFIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBFAX has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to RYFIX (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBFAX dropped -49.33% vs RYFIX's -77.63%.

RYFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBFAX and RYFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer