PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAMIX vs. PALDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAMIX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SAMIX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAMIX achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly lower than PALDX's 7.89% return.


SAMIX

1D
0.16%
1M
2.25%
YTD
5.48%
6M
5.84%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
13.15%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*

PALDX

1D
0.40%
1M
3.05%
YTD
7.89%
6M
8.61%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAMIX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SAMIX
Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio
5.48%12.60%11.53%13.68%-10.56%14.08%9.36%17.88%-7.54%
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
7.89%13.62%18.96%18.90%-15.65%16.30%10.68%22.27%-4.12%

Correlation

The correlation between SAMIX and PALDX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018

0.90

The correlation between SAMIX and PALDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAMIX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAMIX
SAMIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SAMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

PALDX
PALDX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PALDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PALDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PALDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
PALDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PALDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAMIX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SAMIX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAMIXPALDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.69

2.76

-1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.46

3.95

-1.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.52

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

3.65

-1.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.61

17.34

-7.72

SAMIX vs. PALDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the PALDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAMIX and PALDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAMIXPALDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.76

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.79

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.81

-0.22

Drawdowns

SAMIX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAMIX drawdown since its inception was -26.06%, roughly equal to the maximum PALDX drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMIX and PALDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAMIXPALDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.06%

-26.16%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-5.96%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.90%

-16.06%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.54%

-20.47%

+4.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-4.09%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.25%

+0.42%

Volatility

SAMIX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison

Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SAMIX) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) at 2.29%. This indicates that SAMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAMIXPALDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

2.29%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

6.19%

+1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.46%

7.91%

+1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.10%

12.11%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.66%

12.70%

-0.04%

SAMIX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAMIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAMIX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison

SAMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.72%, more than PALDX's 5.02% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PALDX
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund
5.02%5.42%10.40%2.94%6.19%6.87%2.58%4.58%3.65%1.48%
SAMIX
Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio
9.72%10.26%3.60%2.78%5.82%8.13%1.66%2.44%3.03%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SAMIX and PALDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SAMIX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to PALDX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAMIX dropped -26.06% vs PALDX's -26.16%.

PALDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAMIX and PALDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer