PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAMIX vs. SIEPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAMIX vs. SIEPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SAMIX) and Saratoga International Equity Portfolio (SIEPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAMIX achieves a 6.56% return, which is significantly lower than SIEPX's 15.65% return.


SAMIX

1D
1.10%
1M
2.56%
YTD
6.56%
6M
5.60%
1Y
16.05%
3Y*
12.89%
5Y*
7.56%
10Y*

SIEPX

1D
1.29%
1M
3.73%
YTD
15.65%
6M
15.96%
1Y
28.60%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
7.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAMIX vs. SIEPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAMIX
Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio
6.56%12.60%11.53%13.68%-10.56%14.08%9.36%17.88%-7.54%0.00%
SIEPX
Saratoga International Equity Portfolio
15.65%31.89%5.25%14.80%-21.85%19.33%5.87%19.77%-23.89%0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between SAMIX and SIEPX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2017

0.77

The correlation between SAMIX and SIEPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAMIX vs. SIEPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAMIX
SAMIX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SAMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SIEPX
SIEPX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SIEPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIEPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIEPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SIEPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIEPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAMIX vs. SIEPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SAMIX) and Saratoga International Equity Portfolio (SIEPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAMIXSIEPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.33

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

2.44

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.50

9.06

+0.44

SAMIX vs. SIEPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the SIEPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAMIX and SIEPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAMIX vs. SIEPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAMIX drawdown since its inception was -26.06%, smaller than the maximum SIEPX drawdown of -62.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMIX and SIEPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAMIXSIEPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.06%

-62.81%

+36.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-11.41%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.90%

-15.63%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.54%

-35.31%

+19.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

0.00%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-24.01%

+20.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

3.07%

-1.38%

Volatility

SAMIX vs. SIEPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SAMIX) is 3.98%, while Saratoga International Equity Portfolio (SIEPX) has a volatility of 5.70%. This indicates that SAMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIEPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAMIXSIEPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

5.70%

-1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

13.07%

-4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.03%

15.46%

-5.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.20%

16.55%

-5.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.68%

17.66%

-4.98%

SAMIX vs. SIEPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAMIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than SIEPX's 2.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAMIX vs. SIEPX - Dividend Comparison

SAMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.63%, while SIEPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SAMIX
Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio
9.63%10.26%3.60%2.78%5.82%8.13%1.66%2.44%3.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIEPX
Saratoga International Equity Portfolio
0.00%0.00%0.71%0.83%0.31%0.41%1.79%1.97%0.58%0.03%0.63%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAMIX and SIEPX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIEPX has higher volatility (5.70%) compared to SAMIX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAMIX dropped -26.06% vs SIEPX's -62.81%.

SIEPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAMIX and SIEPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer