SAMIX vs. SABIX
SAMIX (Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio) and SABIX (Saratoga Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Saratoga. Over the past 5 years, SAMIX returned 7.56%/yr vs 8.14%/yr for SABIX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
SAMIX vs. SABIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAMIX achieves a 6.56% return, which is significantly lower than SABIX's 7.43% return.
SAMIX
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 6.56%
- 6M
- 5.60%
- 1Y
- 16.05%
- 3Y*
- 12.89%
- 5Y*
- 7.56%
- 10Y*
- —
SABIX
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- 1Y
- 17.71%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.14%
- 10Y*
- —
SAMIX vs. SABIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAMIX Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio | 6.56% | 12.60% | 11.53% | 13.68% | -10.56% | 14.08% | 9.36% | 17.88% | -7.82% |
SABIX Saratoga Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio | 7.43% | 13.01% | 12.49% | 15.20% | -11.36% | 14.93% | 9.53% | 18.72% | -8.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAMIX and SABIX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2018 | 0.99 |
The correlation between SAMIX and SABIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAMIX vs. SABIX — Risk / Return Rank
SAMIX
SABIX
SAMIX vs. SABIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SAMIX) and Saratoga Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SABIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAMIX | SABIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.26 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.50 | 9.77 | -0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAMIX vs. SABIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAMIX drawdown since its inception was -26.06%, smaller than the maximum SABIX drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMIX and SABIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAMIX | SABIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.06% | -29.06% | +3.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.29% | -7.87% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.90% | -14.58% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.54% | -17.20% | +1.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -0.08% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -4.12% | +0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.81% | -0.12% |
Volatility
SAMIX vs. SABIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SAMIX) is 3.98%, while Saratoga Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio (SABIX) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that SAMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SABIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAMIX | SABIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 4.22% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.13% | 8.78% | -0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.03% | 10.89% | -0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.20% | 12.55% | -1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.68% | 14.33% | -1.65% |
SAMIX vs. SABIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SAMIX and SABIX have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
SAMIX vs. SABIX - Dividend Comparison
SAMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.63%, more than SABIX's 9.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SABIX Saratoga Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio | 9.15% | 9.83% | 3.12% | 2.81% | 7.12% | 9.63% | 1.82% | 3.72% | 3.06% |
SAMIX Saratoga Moderately Aggressive Balanced Allocation Portfolio | 9.63% | 10.26% | 3.60% | 2.78% | 5.82% | 8.13% | 1.66% | 2.44% | 3.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, SAMIX and SABIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SABIX has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to SAMIX (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAMIX dropped -26.06% vs SABIX's -29.06%.
SABIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAMIX and SABIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer