PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAIC vs. BAH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

SAIC vs. BAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SAIC vs. BAH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAIC
Science Applications International Corporation
-5.39%-8.73%-9.04%13.58%34.95%-10.20%10.81%39.15%-15.48%-8.18%
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
-6.80%-33.02%2.00%24.47%25.71%-1.04%24.46%60.16%20.21%7.77%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SAIC:

$4.31B

BAH:

$9.62B

EPS

SAIC:

$7.66

BAH:

$6.77

PE Ratio

SAIC:

12.39

BAH:

11.53

PEG Ratio

SAIC:

0.75

BAH:

0.38

PS Ratio

SAIC:

0.61

BAH:

0.85

PB Ratio

SAIC:

2.87

BAH:

9.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

SAIC:

$7.26B

BAH:

$11.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SAIC:

$872.00M

BAH:

$6.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

SAIC:

$624.00M

BAH:

$1.13B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAIC achieves a -5.39% return, which is significantly higher than BAH's -6.80% return. Over the past 10 years, SAIC has underperformed BAH with an annualized return of 7.48%, while BAH has yielded a comparatively higher 11.80% annualized return.


SAIC

1D
0.13%
1M
2.88%
YTD
-5.39%
6M
-3.80%
1Y
-14.30%
3Y*
-2.82%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*
7.48%

BAH

1D
-1.17%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
-6.80%
6M
-20.82%
1Y
-23.53%
3Y*
-3.83%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
11.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAIC vs. BAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAIC
SAIC Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SAIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAIC Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SAIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAIC Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BAH
BAH Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAH Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAH Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAIC vs. BAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAICBAHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.37

-0.59

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.27

-0.58

+0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.92

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

-0.58

+0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.86

-0.95

+0.09

SAIC vs. BAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAIC Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is higher than the BAH Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAIC and BAH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAICBAHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

-0.59

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.03

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.42

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.58

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between SAIC and BAH is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SAIC vs. BAH - Dividend Comparison

SAIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than BAH's 2.87% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SAIC
Science Applications International Corporation
1.56%1.47%1.32%1.19%1.33%1.77%1.56%1.63%1.95%1.62%1.46%2.58%
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
2.87%2.61%1.59%1.47%1.65%1.75%1.42%1.35%1.69%1.78%1.66%1.69%

Drawdowns

SAIC vs. BAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAIC drawdown since its inception was -45.92%, smaller than the maximum BAH drawdown of -58.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAIC and BAH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SAICBAHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.92%

-58.75%

+12.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.69%

-41.32%

+8.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.74%

-58.75%

+13.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.92%

-58.75%

+12.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.36%

-56.66%

+19.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.25%

-10.16%

-2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.85%

25.21%

-8.36%

Volatility

SAIC vs. BAH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is 8.09%, while Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) has a volatility of 9.46%. This indicates that SAIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SAICBAHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.09%

9.46%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.67%

31.63%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.73%

39.94%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.30%

30.40%

-1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.22%

28.38%

+3.84%

Financials

SAIC vs. BAH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Science Applications International Corporation and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
1.75B
2.62B
(SAIC) Total Revenue
(BAH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SAIC vs. BAH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Science Applications International Corporation and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
12.6%
52.0%
Portfolio components
SAIC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Science Applications International Corporation reported a gross profit of 221.00M and revenue of 1.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.6%.

BAH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.36B and revenue of 2.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.0%.

SAIC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Science Applications International Corporation reported an operating income of 133.00M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.

BAH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 230.00M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

SAIC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Science Applications International Corporation reported a net income of 85.00M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in a net margin of 4.9%.

BAH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a net income of 200.00M and revenue of 2.62B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.