SAIC vs. BAH
SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation) and BAH (Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation) are both stocks. SAIC operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while BAH operates in Consulting Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, SAIC returned 8.61%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for BAH. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
SAIC vs. BAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAIC achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly higher than BAH's -16.10% return. Over the past 10 years, SAIC has underperformed BAH with an annualized return of 8.61%, while BAH has yielded a comparatively higher 10.63% annualized return.
SAIC
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 5.90%
- 6M
- 15.93%
- YTD
- 17.58%
- 1Y
- 7.29%
- 3Y*
- -0.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.65%
BAH
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- 11.64%
- 6M
- -19.95%
- YTD
- -16.10%
- 1Y
- -34.73%
- 3Y*
- -15.70%
- 5Y*
- -2.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $197.35M | $164.53M | $161.00M | |
| $51.45M | $49.80M | $59.89M |
SAIC vs. BAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAIC Science Applications International Corporation | 17.58% | -8.73% | -9.04% | 13.58% | 34.95% | -10.20% | 10.81% | 39.15% | -15.48% | -8.18% |
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | -16.10% | -33.02% | 2.00% | 24.47% | 25.71% | -1.04% | 24.46% | 60.16% | 20.21% | 7.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAIC and BAH is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2013 | 0.59 |
The correlation between SAIC and BAH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
SAIC:
$4.95B
BAH:
$8.39B
SAIC:
$8.91
BAH:
$8.47
SAIC:
13.14
BAH:
8.23
SAIC:
0.80
BAH:
0.24
SAIC:
0.73
BAH:
0.58
SAIC:
$7.29B
BAH:
$11.09B
SAIC:
$912.00M
BAH:
$4.96B
SAIC:
$691.00M
BAH:
$1.24B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAIC vs. BAH — Risk / Return Rank
SAIC
BAH
SAIC vs. BAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAIC | BAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.87 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | -0.74 | +0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.39 | -1.33 | +1.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAIC vs. BAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAIC drawdown since its inception was -45.92%, smaller than the maximum BAH drawdown of -66.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAIC and BAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAIC | BAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.92% | -66.59% | +20.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.34% | -45.19% | +13.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.74% | -66.59% | +20.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.74% | -66.59% | +20.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.92% | -66.59% | +20.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.15% | -60.98% | +38.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.73% | -11.20% | -1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.10% | 25.06% | -7.96% |
Volatility
SAIC vs. BAH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is 9.44%, while Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) has a volatility of 13.40%. This indicates that SAIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAIC | BAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.44% | 13.40% | -3.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.67% | 31.52% | -0.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.96% | 40.61% | -0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.48% | 31.93% | -1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.71% | 29.16% | +3.55% |
Dividends
SAIC vs. BAH - Dividend Comparison
SAIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than BAH's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAH Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | 3.27% | 2.61% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.65% | 1.75% | 1.42% | 1.35% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 1.66% | 1.69% |
SAIC Science Applications International Corporation | 1.26% | 1.47% | 1.32% | 1.19% | 1.33% | 1.77% | 1.56% | 1.63% | 1.95% | 1.62% | 1.46% | 2.58% |
Financials
SAIC vs. BAH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Science Applications International Corporation and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SAIC vs. BAH - Profitability Comparison
SAIC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Science Applications International Corporation reported a gross profit of 249.00M and revenue of 1.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.1%.
BAH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.46B and revenue of 2.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.
SAIC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Science Applications International Corporation reported an operating income of 179.00M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
BAH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported an operating income of 279.00M and revenue of 2.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
SAIC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Science Applications International Corporation reported a net income of 115.00M and revenue of 1.91B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
BAH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation reported a net income of 198.00M and revenue of 2.80B, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SAIC and BAH have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BAH has higher volatility (13.40%) compared to SAIC (9.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAIC dropped -45.92% vs BAH's -66.59%.
SAIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SAIC and BAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer