PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYLD vs. SMDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYLD vs. SMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYLD achieves a 13.48% return, which is significantly lower than SMDV's 19.70% return.


RYLD

1D
1.06%
1M
2.27%
6M
10.40%
YTD
13.48%
1Y
26.26%
3Y*
8.70%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.95%

SMDV

1D
1.35%
1M
1.61%
6M
10.97%
YTD
19.70%
1Y
25.46%
3Y*
11.02%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
7.59%
ALL TIME*
8.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.87M$9.43M$9.08M
$4.65M$5.55M$3.54M

RYLD vs. SMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
13.48%5.65%10.13%0.27%-13.03%22.13%-0.44%8.86%
SMDV
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
19.70%0.26%7.03%8.99%-5.90%18.98%-4.74%7.03%

Correlation

The correlation between RYLD and SMDV is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019

0.72

The correlation between RYLD and SMDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RYLD vs. SMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RYLD
SMDV

Healthcare

20.3%
1.9%

Financial Services

17.8%
31.5%

Technology

14.5%
0.8%

Industrials

14.1%
21.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
5.1%

Real Estate

6.8%
6.0%

Energy

5.5%

-

Basic Materials

4.4%
10.5%

Utilities

2.8%
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
3.9%

Communication Services

2.2%
1.1%

Healthcare

RYLD
20.3%
SMDV
1.9%

Financial Services

RYLD
17.8%
SMDV
31.5%

Technology

RYLD
14.5%
SMDV
0.8%

Industrials

RYLD
14.1%
SMDV
21.8%

Consumer Cyclical

RYLD
9.2%
SMDV
5.1%

Real Estate

RYLD
6.8%
SMDV
6.0%

Energy

RYLD
5.5%
SMDV

-

Basic Materials

RYLD
4.4%
SMDV
10.5%

Utilities

RYLD
2.8%
SMDV
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

RYLD
2.6%
SMDV
3.9%

Communication Services

RYLD
2.2%
SMDV
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYLD vs. SMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SMDV
SMDV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYLD vs. SMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYLDSMDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.30

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

2.61

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.17

8.27

+8.90

RYLD vs. SMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the SMDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYLD and SMDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYLD vs. SMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYLD drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, which is greater than SMDV's maximum drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYLD and SMDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYLDSMDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.53%

-34.12%

-7.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.29%

-9.79%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.05%

-21.23%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.33%

-21.23%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.05%

+1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.65%

-5.87%

-2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

3.09%

-1.56%

Volatility

RYLD vs. SMDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) is 2.30%, while ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that RYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYLDSMDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

4.59%

-2.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.74%

10.30%

-2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.58%

15.45%

-4.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.98%

18.56%

-4.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

20.75%

-3.71%

RYLD vs. SMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SMDV's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYLD vs. SMDV - Dividend Comparison

RYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.50%, more than SMDV's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
11.50%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMDV
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF
2.25%2.67%2.68%2.69%2.51%2.02%2.13%2.03%1.97%1.84%1.35%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYLD and SMDV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMDV has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to RYLD (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYLD dropped -41.53% vs SMDV's -34.12%.

On 5-year performance, SMDV leads with 7.51% vs 3.43% for RYLD. On fees, SMDV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SMDV has performed better with a 7.51% return vs 3.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMDV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RYLD.

RYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.50%, compared with 2.25% for SMDV.

RYLD is categorized as Derivative Income, while SMDV is Small Cap Blend Equities. RYLD tracks CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index, while SMDV tracks Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for RYLD and 0.40% for SMDV.

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYLD and SMDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer