SMDV vs. NOBL
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL).
SMDV and NOBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Dividend Growth Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2015. NOBL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. Both SMDV and NOBL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SMDV or NOBL.
Performance
SMDV vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMDV achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 13.33% return.
SMDV
15.65%
7.47%
18.38%
30.08%
6.90%
N/A
NOBL
13.33%
0.16%
10.00%
20.15%
9.87%
10.12%
Key characteristics
| SMDV | NOBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.49 | 2.00 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.26 | 2.81 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.27 | 1.35 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.59 | 3.10 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.24 | 8.98 |
| Ulcer Index | 4.90% | 2.29% |
| Daily Std Dev | 20.54% | 10.26% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.12% | -35.43% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.51% | -1.50% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMDV vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMDV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between SMDV and NOBL is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SMDV vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SMDV vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
SMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than NOBL's 1.99% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMDV ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF | 2.60% | 2.69% | 2.51% | 2.03% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.97% | 1.84% | 1.08% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 1.99% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% | 1.60% | 0.30% |
Drawdowns
SMDV vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMDV drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, roughly equal to the maximum NOBL drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMDV and NOBL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SMDV vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers ETF (SMDV) has a higher volatility of 8.39% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.11%. This indicates that SMDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.