RYJ vs. VO
RYJ (Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - RYJ tracks the Raymond James SB-1 Equity Index while VO tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RYJ returned 10.35%/yr vs 11.55%/yr for VO. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RYJ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
RYJ vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYJ achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, RYJ has underperformed VO with an annualized return of 10.35%, while VO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.55% annualized return.
RYJ
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 7.67%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 17.80%
- 3Y*
- 15.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.35%
VO
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 10.05%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 18.13%
- 3Y*
- 16.69%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
RYJ vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYJ Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF | 10.96% | 8.89% | 13.28% | 15.65% | -13.17% | 24.09% | 6.21% | 32.02% | -14.84% | 13.31% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.05% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYJ and VO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2006 | 0.89 |
The correlation between RYJ and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
RYJ vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RYJ
VO
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
RYJ
VO
Industrials
RYJ
VO
Utilities
RYJ
VO
Consumer Cyclical
RYJ
VO
Technology
RYJ
VO
Communication Services
RYJ
VO
Healthcare
RYJ
VO
Energy
RYJ
VO
Basic Materials
RYJ
VO
Financial Services
RYJ
-
VO
Real Estate
RYJ
-
VO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYJ vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
RYJ
VO
RYJ vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYJ | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 1.48 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.01 | 2.14 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.26 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.79 | 2.23 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.12 | 8.50 | -2.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYJ | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.48 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.45 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.61 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.50 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
RYJ vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYJ drawdown since its inception was -60.74%, roughly equal to the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYJ and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYJ | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.74% | -58.87% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -8.17% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.90% | -19.02% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.31% | -27.57% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.20% | -39.37% | -10.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.45% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -7.86% | -2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.14% | +0.78% |
Volatility
RYJ vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 2.99%. This indicates that RYJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYJ | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 2.99% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.96% | 9.21% | +0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 12.34% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 17.59% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.64% | 18.95% | +2.69% |
RYJ vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYJ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
RYJ vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
RYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than VO's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYJ Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF | 1.57% | 1.75% | 1.28% | 1.39% | 0.72% | 0.52% | 0.28% | 0.20% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 0.93% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RYJ and VO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYJ has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to VO (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYJ dropped -60.74% vs VO's -58.87%.
On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.55% vs 10.35% for RYJ. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.55% return vs 10.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RYJ.
RYJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.36% for VO.
RYJ tracks Raymond James SB-1 Equity Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RYJ and 0.03% for VO.
VO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYJ and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer