RYJ vs. VFQY
RYJ (Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF) and VFQY (Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. RYJ is passively managed, while VFQY is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RYJ returned 7.34%/yr vs 8.56%/yr for VFQY. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RYJ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFQY.
Performance
RYJ vs. VFQY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYJ achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than VFQY's 8.01% return.
RYJ
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- 11.22%
- 6M
- 12.45%
- 1Y
- 18.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
VFQY
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 8.01%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- 1Y
- 20.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.56%
- 10Y*
- —
RYJ vs. VFQY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYJ Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF | 11.22% | 8.89% | 13.28% | 15.65% | -13.17% | 24.09% | 6.21% | 32.02% | -15.56% |
VFQY Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 8.01% | 10.24% | 12.93% | 22.48% | -15.74% | 27.96% | 16.97% | 25.75% | -7.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYJ and VFQY is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between RYJ and VFQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
RYJ vs. VFQY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RYJ
VFQY
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Defensive
RYJ
VFQY
Industrials
RYJ
VFQY
Utilities
RYJ
VFQY
-
Consumer Cyclical
RYJ
VFQY
Technology
RYJ
VFQY
Communication Services
RYJ
VFQY
Healthcare
RYJ
VFQY
Energy
RYJ
VFQY
Basic Materials
RYJ
VFQY
Financial Services
RYJ
-
VFQY
Real Estate
RYJ
-
VFQY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYJ vs. VFQY — Risk / Return Rank
RYJ
VFQY
RYJ vs. VFQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) and Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYJ | VFQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 1.54 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 2.24 | -0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.27 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 2.25 | -0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.46 | 8.35 | -1.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYJ | VFQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 1.54 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.47 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.54 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
RYJ vs. VFQY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYJ drawdown since its inception was -60.74%, which is greater than VFQY's maximum drawdown of -37.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYJ and VFQY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYJ | VFQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.74% | -37.41% | -23.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -9.12% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.90% | -20.67% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.31% | -25.93% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -6.69% | -3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.46% | +0.46% |
Volatility
RYJ vs. VFQY - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF (VFQY) at 2.83%. This indicates that RYJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYJ | VFQY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 2.83% | +1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.99% | 9.47% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 13.51% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 18.33% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 20.87% | +0.78% |
RYJ vs. VFQY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYJ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VFQY's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
RYJ vs. VFQY - Dividend Comparison
RYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than VFQY's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYJ Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF | 1.57% | 1.75% | 1.28% | 1.39% | 0.72% | 0.52% | 0.28% | 0.20% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 0.93% |
VFQY Vanguard U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.09% | 1.17% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.43% | 0.98% | 1.22% | 1.34% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RYJ and VFQY have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYJ has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to VFQY (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYJ dropped -60.74% vs VFQY's -37.41%.
On 5-year performance, VFQY leads with 8.56% vs 7.34% for RYJ. On fees, VFQY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFQY has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFQY has performed better with a 8.56% return vs 7.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFQY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RYJ.
RYJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.57%, compared with 1.09% for VFQY.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RYJ and 0.13% for VFQY.
VFQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYJ and VFQY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer