PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYJ vs. TUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYJ vs. TUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) and First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYJ achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than TUSA's 6.76% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RYJ having a 10.38% annualized return and TUSA not far ahead at 10.77%.


RYJ

1D
0.34%
1M
6.49%
YTD
11.22%
6M
12.45%
1Y
18.81%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
7.34%
10Y*
10.38%

TUSA

1D
0.68%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
6.76%
6M
8.73%
1Y
20.01%
3Y*
16.12%
5Y*
6.36%
10Y*
10.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYJ vs. TUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYJ
Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF
11.22%8.89%13.28%15.65%-13.17%24.09%6.21%32.02%-14.84%13.31%
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
6.76%13.64%11.12%11.75%-13.54%24.79%14.16%24.29%-10.35%20.07%

Correlation

The correlation between RYJ and TUSA is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2006

0.66

The correlation between RYJ and TUSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (all time) to 0.83 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RYJ vs. TUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RYJ
TUSA

Consumer Defensive

23.3%
4.1%

Industrials

20.7%
19.8%

Utilities

12.5%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
16.0%

Technology

9.8%
6.1%

Communication Services

7.7%
2.0%

Healthcare

5.8%
2.0%

Energy

4.1%
1.9%

Basic Materials

4.0%
14.1%

Financial Services

-

31.9%

Real Estate

-

2.1%

Consumer Defensive

RYJ
23.3%
TUSA
4.1%

Industrials

RYJ
20.7%
TUSA
19.8%

Utilities

RYJ
12.5%
TUSA
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

RYJ
12.2%
TUSA
16.0%

Technology

RYJ
9.8%
TUSA
6.1%

Communication Services

RYJ
7.7%
TUSA
2.0%

Healthcare

RYJ
5.8%
TUSA
2.0%

Energy

RYJ
4.1%
TUSA
1.9%

Basic Materials

RYJ
4.0%
TUSA
14.1%

Financial Services

RYJ

-

TUSA
31.9%

Real Estate

RYJ

-

TUSA
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYJ vs. TUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYJ
RYJ Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
RYJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
RYJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

TUSA
TUSA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
TUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYJ vs. TUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) and First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYJTUSADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

1.56

-0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.11

2.36

-0.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.27

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

3.04

-1.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.46

8.24

-1.77

RYJ vs. TUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the TUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYJ and TUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYJTUSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.56

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.36

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.54

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.32

+0.03

Drawdowns

RYJ vs. TUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYJ drawdown since its inception was -60.74%, which is greater than TUSA's maximum drawdown of -56.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYJ and TUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYJTUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.74%

-56.53%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.01%

-6.57%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.90%

-18.04%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.31%

-23.35%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.20%

-42.47%

-7.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.26%

+4.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-9.87%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

2.42%

+0.50%

Volatility

RYJ vs. TUSA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (RYJ) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) at 3.53%. This indicates that RYJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYJTUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.56%

3.53%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

8.87%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.62%

12.92%

+0.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.65%

17.65%

+1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.65%

20.14%

+1.51%

RYJ vs. TUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYJ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TUSA's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYJ vs. TUSA - Dividend Comparison

RYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than TUSA's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYJ
Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF
1.57%1.75%1.28%1.39%0.72%0.52%0.28%0.20%1.43%0.00%1.55%0.93%
TUSA
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF
1.65%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYJ and TUSA have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYJ has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to TUSA (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYJ dropped -60.74% vs TUSA's -56.53%.

On 10-year performance, TUSA leads with 10.77% vs 10.38% for RYJ. On fees, RYJ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TUSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TUSA has performed better with a 10.77% return vs 10.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RYJ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TUSA.

TUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 1.57% for RYJ.

RYJ tracks Raymond James SB-1 Equity Index, while TUSA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RYJ and 0.70% for TUSA.

TUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYJ and TUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer