RYCEY vs. WDS
RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) and WDS (Woodside Energy Group Ltd) are both stocks. RYCEY operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while WDS operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, RYCEY returned 8.49%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for WDS. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RYCEY vs. WDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly lower than WDS's 52.08% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCEY has outperformed WDS with an annualized return of 8.49%, while WDS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.
RYCEY
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 7.56%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 19.66%
- 1Y
- 46.06%
- 3Y*
- 113.04%
- 5Y*
- 61.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
WDS
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 52.08%
- 6M
- 46.18%
- 1Y
- 58.11%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
RYCEY vs. WDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 12.43% | 123.64% | 88.21% | 253.27% | -33.95% | 2.53% | -82.05% | -12.69% | -7.35% | 40.70% |
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 52.08% | 6.78% | -20.60% | -4.42% | 68.06% | -6.77% | -24.23% | 14.38% | -9.70% | 19.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYCEY and WDS is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014 | 0.28 |
The correlation between RYCEY and WDS shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RYCEY:
$147.86B
WDS:
$44.17B
RYCEY:
£0.99
WDS:
$3.29
RYCEY:
13.26
WDS:
7.02
RYCEY:
0.03
WDS:
0.24
RYCEY:
2.77
WDS:
1.69
RYCEY:
40.55
WDS:
1.23
RYCEY:
£40.04B
WDS:
$26.15B
RYCEY:
£10.10B
WDS:
$9.87B
RYCEY:
£8.04B
WDS:
$17.06B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYCEY vs. WDS — Risk / Return Rank
RYCEY
WDS
RYCEY vs. WDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RYCEY | WDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.32 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 3.40 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.98 | 7.88 | -1.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RYCEY vs. WDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than WDS's maximum drawdown of -77.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and WDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYCEY | WDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.07% | -77.06% | -22.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.75% | -17.16% | -4.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.37% | -48.77% | +25.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.01% | -48.77% | -13.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.64% | -66.16% | -28.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.68% | -10.20% | -67.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.15% | -39.55% | -44.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.73% | 7.40% | +0.33% |
Volatility
RYCEY vs. WDS - Volatility Comparison
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a higher volatility of 12.00% compared to Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) at 10.13%. This indicates that RYCEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYCEY | WDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.00% | 10.13% | +1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.70% | 24.23% | +8.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.88% | 30.62% | +7.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.48% | 33.40% | +10.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.35% | 33.78% | +15.57% |
Dividends
RYCEY vs. WDS - Dividend Comparison
RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than WDS's 4.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc | 0.72% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.51% | 1.56% | 1.32% | 1.55% | 4.19% | 14.44% |
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 4.85% | 6.80% | 8.27% | 10.62% | 8.84% | 2.39% | 4.41% | 5.12% | 5.45% | 3.65% | 5.21% | 9.84% |
Financials
RYCEY vs. WDS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rolls-Royce Holdings plc and Woodside Energy Group Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RYCEY vs. WDS - Profitability Comparison
RYCEY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
WDS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.99B and revenue of 6.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.1%.
RYCEY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
WDS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.
RYCEY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
WDS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a net income of 1.40B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RYCEY and WDS have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYCEY has higher volatility (12.00%) compared to WDS (10.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCEY dropped -99.07% vs WDS's -77.06%.
WDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYCEY and WDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer