RYCEY vs. CIBR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

RYCEY (Rolls-Royce Holdings plc) is a stock, while CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) is Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Over the past 10 years, RYCEY returned 8.49%/yr vs 17.88%/yr for CIBR. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RYCEY vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 19.63% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCEY has underperformed CIBR with an annualized return of 8.49%, while CIBR has yielded a comparatively higher 17.88% annualized return.

RYCEY

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: 7.56%
• YTD: 12.43%
• 6M: 19.66%
• 1Y: 46.06%
• 3Y*: 113.04%
• 5Y*: 61.46%
• 10Y*: 8.49%

CIBR

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 12.50%
• YTD: 19.63%
• 6M: 15.68%
• 1Y: 17.38%
• 3Y*: 24.30%
• 5Y*: 13.58%
• 10Y*: 17.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYCEY vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc	12.43%	123.64%	88.21%	253.27%	-33.95%	2.53%	-82.05%	-12.69%	-7.35%	40.70%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	19.63%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	50.53%	28.52%	1.47%	18.61%

Correlation

The correlation between RYCEY and CIBR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015	0.33

The correlation between RYCEY and CIBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.35 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RYCEY vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYCEY

RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 77
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 73
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 80

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 21
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYCEY vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RYCEY	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	0.69	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	1.11	+0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.14	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	0.79	+1.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.98	1.86	+4.12

RYCEY vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCEY and CIBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RYCEY vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RYCEY	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.07%	-33.89%	-65.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.75%	-21.99%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.37%	-21.99%	-1.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.01%	-33.89%	-28.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-94.64%	-33.89%	-60.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.68%	-9.53%	-68.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.15%	-8.66%	-75.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.73%	9.38%	-1.65%

Volatility

RYCEY vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) have volatilities of 12.00% and 12.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RYCEY	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.00%	12.35%	-0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.70%	21.72%	+10.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.88%	25.16%	+12.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.48%	25.04%	+18.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.35%	23.65%	+25.70%

Dividends

RYCEY vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than CIBR's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.48%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc	0.72%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.51%	1.56%	1.32%	1.55%	4.19%	14.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RYCEY and CIBR in my portfolio?

RYCEY and CIBR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RYCEY or CIBR?

CIBR has higher volatility (12.35%) compared to RYCEY (12.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCEY dropped -99.07% vs CIBR's -33.89%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYCEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.