PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RWJ vs. FDIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RWJ vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RWJ achieves a 21.05% return, which is significantly higher than FDIS's 0.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RWJ having a 13.64% annualized return and FDIS not far ahead at 13.98%.


RWJ

1D
1.08%
1M
7.83%
YTD
21.05%
6M
17.99%
1Y
42.98%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
13.64%

FDIS

1D
0.20%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.01%
6M
-1.14%
1Y
12.39%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RWJ vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RWJ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
21.05%7.75%11.81%16.21%-10.97%52.82%20.83%20.29%-16.95%5.30%
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.01%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%

Correlation

The correlation between RWJ and FDIS is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.72

The correlation between RWJ and FDIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

RWJ vs. FDIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RWJ
FDIS

Consumer Cyclical

23.9%
96.9%

Industrials

16.2%
0.8%

Healthcare

11.2%
0.1%

Financial Services

11.0%
0.1%

Technology

9.9%
0.9%

Energy

7.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.9%
1.0%

Basic Materials

5.2%

-

Real Estate

4.0%
0.1%

Communication Services

3.3%
0.2%

Utilities

0.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

RWJ
23.9%
FDIS
96.9%

Industrials

RWJ
16.2%
FDIS
0.8%

Healthcare

RWJ
11.2%
FDIS
0.1%

Financial Services

RWJ
11.0%
FDIS
0.1%

Technology

RWJ
9.9%
FDIS
0.9%

Energy

RWJ
7.4%
FDIS

-

Consumer Defensive

RWJ
6.9%
FDIS
1.0%

Basic Materials

RWJ
5.2%
FDIS

-

Real Estate

RWJ
4.0%
FDIS
0.1%

Communication Services

RWJ
3.3%
FDIS
0.2%

Utilities

RWJ
0.9%
FDIS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RWJ vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RWJ
RWJ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
RWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RWJ vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RWJFDISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.11

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

0.72

+2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.43

2.24

+9.19

RWJ vs. FDIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RWJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the FDIS Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RWJ and FDIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RWJ vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RWJ drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWJ and FDIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RWJFDISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.97%

-39.16%

-16.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-15.50%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.29%

-27.43%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.29%

-39.16%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.33%

-39.16%

-12.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.58%

+4.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.22%

-7.49%

-1.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

5.01%

-1.49%

Volatility

RWJ vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) is 4.67%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that RWJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RWJFDISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

6.19%

-1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.46%

13.44%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.48%

18.52%

+0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.71%

23.92%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.14%

22.32%

+3.82%

RWJ vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RWJ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

RWJ vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison

RWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, more than FDIS's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
RWJ
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF
0.97%1.11%1.15%1.34%1.02%0.61%0.89%1.22%1.44%1.11%0.60%0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


RWJ and FDIS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDIS has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to RWJ (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RWJ dropped -55.97% vs FDIS's -39.16%.

On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.98% vs 13.64% for RWJ. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, RWJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 13.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWJ.

RWJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.

RWJ is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while FDIS is Consumer Discretionary Equities. RWJ tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RWJ and 0.08% for FDIS.

RWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RWJ and FDIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer