RWJ vs. RWK
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK).
RWJ and RWK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RWJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008. RWK is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008. Both RWJ and RWK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RWJ or RWK.
Correlation
The correlation between RWJ and RWK is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RWJ vs. RWK - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RWJ:
0.63
RWK:
0.80
RWJ:
1.05
RWK:
1.22
RWJ:
1.12
RWK:
1.15
RWJ:
1.33
RWK:
1.55
RWJ:
3.28
RWK:
4.17
RWJ:
4.12%
RWK:
3.20%
RWJ:
21.39%
RWK:
16.78%
RWJ:
-55.97%
RWK:
-56.49%
RWJ:
-7.64%
RWK:
-8.03%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RWJ having a 11.35% return and RWK slightly higher at 11.72%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RWJ having a 10.38% annualized return and RWK not far behind at 10.34%.
RWJ
11.35%
-2.10%
14.31%
11.73%
16.37%
10.38%
RWK
11.72%
-3.07%
5.77%
12.08%
13.55%
10.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RWJ vs. RWK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RWJ and RWK have an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RWJ vs. RWK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RWJ vs. RWK - Dividend Comparison
RWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than RWK's 0.83% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 0.91% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 0.61% | 0.89% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.74% | 0.57% | 1.27% |
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF | 0.83% | 1.05% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 0.96% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 0.74% | 1.30% | 0.92% | 1.03% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
RWJ vs. RWK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWJ drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, roughly equal to the maximum RWK drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWJ and RWK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RWJ vs. RWK - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) at 5.27%. This indicates that RWJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.