RWJ vs. XSVM
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM).
RWJ and XSVM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RWJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Feb 22, 2008. XSVM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. Both RWJ and XSVM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RWJ or XSVM.
Correlation
The correlation between RWJ and XSVM is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RWJ vs. XSVM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RWJ:
0.63
XSVM:
0.18
RWJ:
1.05
XSVM:
0.43
RWJ:
1.12
XSVM:
1.05
RWJ:
1.33
XSVM:
0.32
RWJ:
3.28
XSVM:
0.68
RWJ:
4.12%
XSVM:
5.66%
RWJ:
21.39%
XSVM:
21.73%
RWJ:
-55.97%
XSVM:
-62.57%
RWJ:
-7.64%
XSVM:
-9.70%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RWJ achieves a 11.35% return, which is significantly higher than XSVM's 2.42% return. Over the past 10 years, RWJ has outperformed XSVM with an annualized return of 10.38%, while XSVM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.83% annualized return.
RWJ
11.35%
-2.10%
14.31%
11.73%
16.37%
10.38%
XSVM
2.42%
-6.47%
5.90%
2.03%
11.84%
9.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RWJ vs. XSVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RWJ and XSVM have an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RWJ vs. XSVM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RWJ vs. XSVM - Dividend Comparison
RWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than XSVM's 1.29% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RWJ Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF | 0.91% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 0.61% | 0.89% | 1.22% | 1.44% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.74% | 0.57% | 1.27% |
XSVM Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.29% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.23% | 1.21% | 1.22% | 2.54% | 1.90% | 2.29% | 2.68% | 1.32% | 1.15% |
Drawdowns
RWJ vs. XSVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RWJ drawdown since its inception was -55.97%, smaller than the maximum XSVM drawdown of -62.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RWJ and XSVM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RWJ vs. XSVM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Value with Momentum ETF (XSVM) have volatilities of 6.21% and 5.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.