RSPS vs. EMLC
RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and EMLC (VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while EMLC is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPS returned 4.67%/yr vs 2.28%/yr for EMLC. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EMLC.
Performance
RSPS vs. EMLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 7.30% return, which is significantly higher than EMLC's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has outperformed EMLC with an annualized return of 4.67%, while EMLC has yielded a comparatively lower 2.28% annualized return.
RSPS
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 7.30%
- 6M
- 4.56%
- 1Y
- 6.07%
- 3Y*
- 0.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.38%
- 10Y*
- 4.67%
EMLC
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 9.22%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- 2.28%
RSPS vs. EMLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 7.30% | -0.88% | -1.47% | -5.39% | 2.88% | 14.68% | 6.19% | 28.17% | -10.86% | 14.20% |
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 1.40% | 18.81% | -2.97% | 11.18% | -10.58% | -9.72% | 3.08% | 9.79% | -7.57% | 13.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPS and EMLC is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2010 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPS vs. EMLC — Risk / Return Rank
RSPS
EMLC
RSPS vs. EMLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPS | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.24 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 1.42 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.77 | 4.75 | -3.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPS vs. EMLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, which is greater than EMLC's maximum drawdown of -32.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and EMLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPS | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.93% | -32.43% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.72% | -6.19% | -5.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.53% | -9.15% | -7.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -24.58% | +5.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.42% | -26.47% | +1.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.32% | -3.83% | -2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -14.35% | +9.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.29% | 1.86% | +4.43% |
Volatility
RSPS vs. EMLC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) at 2.44%. This indicates that RSPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPS | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 2.44% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.48% | 6.17% | +4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.78% | 7.06% | +6.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 9.14% | +4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 10.04% | +4.85% |
RSPS vs. EMLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EMLC's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPS vs. EMLC - Dividend Comparison
RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than EMLC's 6.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.16% | 5.91% | 6.55% | 5.97% | 5.54% | 5.25% | 4.90% | 6.25% | 6.50% | 5.34% | 5.32% | 6.25% |
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.71% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPS and EMLC have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPS has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to EMLC (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs EMLC's -32.43%.
On 10-year performance, RSPS leads with 4.67% vs 2.28% for EMLC. On fees, EMLC is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, EMLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RSPS has performed better with a 4.67% return vs 2.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMLC is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPS.
EMLC has the higher dividend yield at 6.16%, compared with 2.71% for RSPS.
RSPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while EMLC is Emerging Markets Bonds. RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while EMLC tracks J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.30% for EMLC.
EMLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPS and EMLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer