RSPS vs. QQQ
RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPS returned 4.43%/yr vs 22.07%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
RSPS vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 4.59% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 4.43%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.07% annualized return.
RSPS
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 4.59%
- 6M
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- 2.06%
- 3Y*
- -0.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
QQQ
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 14.99%
- 1Y
- 34.88%
- 3Y*
- 26.05%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 22.07%
RSPS vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 4.59% | -0.88% | -1.47% | -5.39% | 2.88% | 14.68% | 6.19% | 28.17% | -10.86% | 14.20% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.45% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPS and QQQ is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006 | 0.43 |
The correlation between RSPS and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RSPS vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPS
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
RSPS
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
RSPS
QQQ
Financial Services
RSPS
QQQ
Basic Materials
RSPS
-
QQQ
Communication Services
RSPS
-
QQQ
Energy
RSPS
-
QQQ
Healthcare
RSPS
-
QQQ
Industrials
RSPS
-
QQQ
Real Estate
RSPS
-
QQQ
Technology
RSPS
-
QQQ
Utilities
RSPS
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPS vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
RSPS
QQQ
RSPS vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.35 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 2.93 | -2.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.32 | 10.86 | -10.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPS vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.93% | -82.97% | +47.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.72% | -11.96% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.53% | -22.77% | +6.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -35.12% | +16.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.42% | -35.12% | +9.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.68% | -4.25% | -4.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -32.73% | +27.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.43% | 3.22% | +3.21% |
Volatility
RSPS vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is 5.30%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that RSPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPS | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 9.17% | -3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | 14.57% | -3.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.05% | 17.96% | -3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.70% | 22.69% | -8.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 22.42% | -7.50% |
RSPS vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPS vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.97% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPS and QQQ have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to RSPS (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.07% vs 4.43% for RSPS. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, RSPS has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.07% return vs 4.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPS.
RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 0.43% for QQQ.
RSPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPS and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer