EMLC vs. EMBD
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) and Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD).
EMLC and EMBD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMLC is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010. EMBD is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Jun 1, 2020.
Performance
EMLC vs. EMBD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMLC vs. EMBD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | -1.86% | 18.81% | -2.97% | 11.18% | -10.58% | -9.72% | 8.19% |
EMBD Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF | -1.48% | 12.55% | 6.76% | 10.60% | -13.84% | -1.84% | 11.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMLC achieves a -1.86% return, which is significantly lower than EMBD's -1.48% return.
EMLC
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -5.14%
- YTD
- -1.86%
- 6M
- 1.38%
- 1Y
- 11.82%
- 3Y*
- 6.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.81%
EMBD
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- -1.48%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 8.59%
- 3Y*
- 8.39%
- 5Y*
- 2.83%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMLC vs. EMBD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMLC has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EMBD's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMLC vs. EMBD — Risk / Return Rank
EMLC
EMBD
EMLC vs. EMBD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) and Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMLC | EMBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.68 | 1.33 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.28 | 1.85 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.24 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 2.03 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.57 | 8.31 | +0.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMLC | EMBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 1.33 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.31 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.41 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMLC and EMBD is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EMLC vs. EMBD - Dividend Comparison
EMLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.10%, more than EMBD's 5.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.10% | 5.91% | 6.55% | 5.97% | 5.54% | 5.25% | 4.90% | 6.25% | 6.50% | 5.34% | 5.32% | 6.25% |
EMBD Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.74% | 5.48% | 5.83% | 5.29% | 4.53% | 4.99% | 3.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EMLC vs. EMBD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMLC drawdown since its inception was -32.43%, which is greater than EMBD's maximum drawdown of -24.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLC and EMBD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMLC | EMBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.43% | -24.27% | -8.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.19% | -4.23% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -24.27% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.92% | -3.20% | -3.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.48% | -6.02% | -8.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.41% | 1.03% | +0.38% |
Volatility
EMLC vs. EMBD - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMBD) at 2.56%. This indicates that EMLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMBD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMLC | EMBD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 2.56% | +1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.04% | 4.28% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.08% | 6.51% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.11% | 9.14% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.13% | 8.96% | +1.17% |