PortfoliosLab logo
EMLC vs. LEMB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EMLC and LEMB is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

EMLC vs. LEMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EMLC:

0.73

LEMB:

0.81

Sortino Ratio

EMLC:

1.27

LEMB:

1.39

Omega Ratio

EMLC:

1.15

LEMB:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

EMLC:

0.31

LEMB:

0.35

Martin Ratio

EMLC:

1.73

LEMB:

1.97

Ulcer Index

EMLC:

3.74%

LEMB:

3.37%

Daily Std Dev

EMLC:

7.79%

LEMB:

7.19%

Max Drawdown

EMLC:

-32.32%

LEMB:

-28.42%

Current Drawdown

EMLC:

-13.90%

LEMB:

-11.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMLC achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly higher than LEMB's 7.01% return. Over the past 10 years, EMLC has outperformed LEMB with an annualized return of 0.53%, while LEMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.19% annualized return.


EMLC

YTD

7.69%

1M

1.52%

6M

6.30%

1Y

5.45%

5Y*

1.81%

10Y*

0.53%

LEMB

YTD

7.01%

1M

1.18%

6M

6.10%

1Y

5.72%

5Y*

1.05%

10Y*

0.19%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMLC vs. LEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EMLC and LEMB have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EMLC vs. LEMB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMLC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EMLC is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EMLC is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EMLC is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EMLC is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EMLC is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EMLC is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

LEMB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LEMB is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LEMB is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LEMB is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LEMB is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LEMB is 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LEMB is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EMLC vs. LEMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EMLC Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is comparable to the LEMB Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMLC and LEMB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

EMLC vs. LEMB - Dividend Comparison

EMLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%, while LEMB has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EMLC
VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF
6.19%6.55%5.97%5.68%5.25%4.90%6.26%6.50%5.34%5.32%6.25%5.98%
LEMB
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF
0.00%0.00%1.34%0.86%3.89%0.00%4.39%6.91%0.00%0.00%0.64%2.85%

Drawdowns

EMLC vs. LEMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMLC drawdown since its inception was -32.32%, which is greater than LEMB's maximum drawdown of -28.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLC and LEMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

EMLC vs. LEMB - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (LEMB) have volatilities of 1.67% and 1.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...