RSPS vs. XLP
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP).
RSPS and XLP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPS is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC. It was launched on Nov 1, 2006. XLP is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both RSPS and XLP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RSPS or XLP.
Correlation
The correlation between RSPS and XLP is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RSPS vs. XLP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
RSPS:
0.02
XLP:
1.50
RSPS:
0.10
XLP:
2.19
RSPS:
1.01
XLP:
1.25
RSPS:
0.02
XLP:
2.13
RSPS:
0.05
XLP:
7.62
RSPS:
3.42%
XLP:
1.91%
RSPS:
10.98%
XLP:
9.73%
RSPS:
-35.93%
XLP:
-35.89%
RSPS:
-9.66%
XLP:
-4.20%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 13.74% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has underperformed XLP with an annualized return of 6.03%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively higher 7.76% annualized return.
RSPS
-0.48%
-2.89%
0.60%
-0.08%
3.35%
6.03%
XLP
13.74%
-2.83%
4.94%
14.03%
7.55%
7.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSPS vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.13% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RSPS vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RSPS vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison
RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than XLP's 2.73% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.83% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% | 1.74% | 1.54% |
XLP Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund | 2.73% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.53% | 2.40% | 2.39% |
Drawdowns
RSPS vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, roughly equal to the maximum XLP drawdown of -35.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and XLP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RSPS vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) at 2.52%. This indicates that RSPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.