PortfoliosLab logo
RSPS vs. XLP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RSPS and XLP is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RSPS vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

340.00%360.00%380.00%400.00%420.00%440.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
369.36%
418.82%
RSPS
XLP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RSPS:

-0.23

XLP:

0.78

Sortino Ratio

RSPS:

-0.23

XLP:

1.17

Omega Ratio

RSPS:

0.97

XLP:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

RSPS:

-0.22

XLP:

1.24

Martin Ratio

RSPS:

-0.62

XLP:

3.30

Ulcer Index

RSPS:

5.06%

XLP:

3.13%

Daily Std Dev

RSPS:

13.88%

XLP:

13.24%

Max Drawdown

RSPS:

-35.93%

XLP:

-35.89%

Current Drawdown

RSPS:

-10.07%

XLP:

-2.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 4.03% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has underperformed XLP with an annualized return of 5.73%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively higher 8.01% annualized return.


RSPS

YTD

0.53%

1M

1.21%

6M

-2.44%

1Y

-2.80%

5Y*

5.48%

10Y*

5.73%

XLP

YTD

4.03%

1M

3.68%

6M

1.88%

1Y

9.94%

5Y*

10.34%

10Y*

8.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSPS vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.13% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RSPS vs. XLP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RSPS is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RSPS is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RSPS is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RSPS is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RSPS is 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RSPS is 99
Martin Ratio Rank

XLP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLP is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLP is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLP is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLP is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLP is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLP is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RSPS vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RSPS Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPS and XLP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.23
0.78
RSPS
XLP

Dividends

RSPS vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than XLP's 2.51% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RSPS
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF
2.86%2.86%2.78%2.31%2.07%2.14%2.12%2.43%1.90%1.76%1.77%1.74%
XLP
Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund
2.51%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.53%2.40%

Drawdowns

RSPS vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, roughly equal to the maximum XLP drawdown of -35.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and XLP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-10.07%
-2.18%
RSPS
XLP

Volatility

RSPS vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) have volatilities of 6.28% and 6.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6.28%
6.05%
RSPS
XLP