RSPS vs. XLP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - RSPS tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC while XLP tracks the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPS returned 4.15%/yr vs 7.20%/yr for XLP. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLP.

Performance

RSPS vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 6.36% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has underperformed XLP with an annualized return of 4.15%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively higher 7.20% annualized return.

RSPS

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -0.54%
• YTD: 1.64%
• 6M: 0.96%
• 1Y: -1.56%
• 3Y*: -1.72%
• 5Y*: -0.01%
• 10Y*: 4.15%

XLP

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 6.36%
• 6M: 5.65%
• 1Y: 1.97%
• 3Y*: 6.59%
• 5Y*: 5.55%
• 10Y*: 7.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPS vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	1.64%	-0.88%	-1.47%	-5.39%	2.88%	14.68%	6.19%	28.17%	-10.86%	14.20%
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF	6.36%	1.52%	12.20%	-0.82%	-0.81%	17.20%	10.11%	27.43%	-8.07%	12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPS and XLP is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2006	0.85

The correlation between RSPS and XLP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPS vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPS	XLP
Consumer Defensive	96.9%	99.0%
Consumer Cyclical	3.1%	1.0%
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RSPS vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPS

RSPS Risk / Return Rank: 7
RSPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
RSPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
RSPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7
RSPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
RSPS Martin Ratio Rank: 7

XLP

XLP Risk / Return Rank: 10
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 10
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPS vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSPS	XLP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	0.16	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.07	0.31	-0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.04	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.13	0.20	-0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.26	0.40	-0.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPS vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPS Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPS and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSPS	XLP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12	0.16	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	0.42	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	0.49	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.43	+0.13

Drawdowns

RSPS vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, roughly equal to the maximum XLP drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and XLP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPS	XLP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.93%	-35.90%	-0.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.72%	-9.69%	-2.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.53%	-12.39%	-4.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.61%	-16.30%	-2.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.42%	-24.51%	-0.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.26%	-8.21%	-3.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.05%	-7.06%	+2.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.13%	4.93%	+1.20%

Volatility

RSPS vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is 3.69%, while State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that RSPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPS	XLP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.69%	3.97%	-0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.14%	9.86%	+0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.51%	12.66%	+0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.60%	13.29%	+0.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.87%	14.73%	+0.14%

RSPS vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPS vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than XLP's 2.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF	2.87%	2.82%	2.86%	2.78%	2.31%	2.07%	2.14%	2.12%	2.43%	1.90%	1.76%	1.77%
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.65%	2.75%	2.77%	2.63%	2.47%	2.28%	2.50%	2.57%	3.04%	2.62%	2.53%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPS and XLP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, RSPS and XLP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RSPS or XLP?

XLP has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to RSPS (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs XLP's -35.90%.

Which ETF is better, RSPS or XLP?

On 10-year performance, XLP leads with 7.20% vs 4.15% for RSPS. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, RSPS has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPS or XLP?

Over the 10-year period, XLP has performed better with a 7.20% return vs 4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPS or XLP?

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPS or XLP?

RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 2.65% for XLP.

What is the main difference between RSPS and XLP?

RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.08% for XLP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.