EMLC vs. EMB
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB).
EMLC and EMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMLC is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010. EMB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. Both EMLC and EMB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMLC or EMB.
Key characteristics
| EMLC | EMB | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -4.28% | -0.80% |
| 1Y Return | 1.35% | 7.44% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -3.40% | -3.33% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -0.97% | -0.08% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -1.24% | 2.20% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.18 | 0.79 |
| Daily Std Dev | 8.40% | 9.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.33% | -34.70% |
| Current Drawdown | -21.14% | -13.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMLC and EMB is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EMLC vs. EMB - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EMLC achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly lower than EMB's -0.80% return. Over the past 10 years, EMLC has underperformed EMB with an annualized return of -1.24%, while EMB has yielded a comparatively higher 2.20% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMLC vs. EMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMLC has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EMB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMLC vs. EMB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EMLC vs. EMB - Dividend Comparison
EMLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than EMB's 4.91% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.42% | 5.96% | 5.68% | 5.25% | 4.88% | 6.26% | 6.50% | 5.34% | 5.32% | 6.25% | 5.98% | 5.18% |
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 4.91% | 4.74% | 5.04% | 3.89% | 3.88% | 4.51% | 5.64% | 4.54% | 4.83% | 4.84% | 4.56% | 4.75% |
Drawdowns
EMLC vs. EMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMLC drawdown since its inception was -32.33%, smaller than the maximum EMB drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLC and EMB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EMLC vs. EMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) is 2.41%, while iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) has a volatility of 2.63%. This indicates that EMLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.