EMLC vs. EBND
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND).
EMLC and EBND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMLC is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2010. EBND is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Emerging Market Local Currency Government Diversified. It was launched on Feb 23, 2011. Both EMLC and EBND are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMLC or EBND.
Key characteristics
| EMLC | EBND | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -4.28% | -5.07% |
| 1Y Return | 1.35% | -0.45% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -3.40% | -4.83% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -0.97% | -1.39% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -1.24% | -1.13% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.18 | -0.03 |
| Daily Std Dev | 8.40% | 8.37% |
| Max Drawdown | -32.33% | -29.57% |
| Current Drawdown | -21.14% | -18.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMLC and EBND is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EMLC vs. EBND - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EMLC achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly higher than EBND's -5.07% return. Over the past 10 years, EMLC has underperformed EBND with an annualized return of -1.24%, while EBND has yielded a comparatively higher -1.13% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMLC vs. EBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EMLC and EBND have an expense ratio of 0.30%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMLC vs. EBND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EMLC vs. EBND - Dividend Comparison
EMLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than EBND's 5.57% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.42% | 5.96% | 5.68% | 5.25% | 4.88% | 6.26% | 6.50% | 5.34% | 5.32% | 6.25% | 5.98% | 5.18% |
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF | 5.57% | 5.27% | 4.60% | 3.83% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 4.70% | 2.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 2.31% |
Drawdowns
EMLC vs. EBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMLC drawdown since its inception was -32.33%, which is greater than EBND's maximum drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMLC and EBND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EMLC vs. EBND - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) have volatilities of 2.41% and 2.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.