RSPS vs. VDC
RSPS (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF) and VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - RSPS tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC while VDC tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPS returned 4.43%/yr vs 7.94%/yr for VDC. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDC.
Performance
RSPS vs. VDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPS achieves a 4.59% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 8.86% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPS has underperformed VDC with an annualized return of 4.43%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.94% annualized return.
RSPS
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 4.59%
- 6M
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- 2.06%
- 3Y*
- -0.85%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
VDC
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 5.57%
- 3Y*
- 8.14%
- 5Y*
- 7.27%
- 10Y*
- 7.94%
RSPS vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 4.59% | -0.88% | -1.47% | -5.39% | 2.88% | 14.68% | 6.19% | 28.17% | -10.86% | 14.20% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 8.86% | 2.17% | 13.30% | 2.38% | -1.79% | 17.64% | 10.86% | 26.11% | -7.79% | 11.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPS and VDC is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006 | 0.86 |
The correlation between RSPS and VDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSPS vs. VDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPS
VDC
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
RSPS
VDC
Consumer Cyclical
RSPS
VDC
Financial Services
RSPS
VDC
-
Basic Materials
RSPS
-
VDC
Communication Services
RSPS
-
VDC
-
Energy
RSPS
-
VDC
-
Healthcare
RSPS
-
VDC
Industrials
RSPS
-
VDC
Real Estate
RSPS
-
VDC
-
Technology
RSPS
-
VDC
-
Utilities
RSPS
-
VDC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPS vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank
RSPS
VDC
RSPS vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPS | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.08 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 0.60 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.32 | 1.20 | -0.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPS vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPS drawdown since its inception was -35.93%, roughly equal to the maximum VDC drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPS and VDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPS | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.93% | -34.24% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.72% | -9.28% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.53% | -11.78% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -16.55% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.42% | -25.31% | -0.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.68% | -5.83% | -2.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -3.73% | -1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.43% | 4.67% | +1.76% |
Volatility
RSPS vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 5.04%. This indicates that RSPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPS | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.30% | 5.04% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.95% | 10.34% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.05% | 12.79% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.70% | 13.20% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 14.68% | +0.24% |
RSPS vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPS vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison
RSPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than VDC's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPS Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF | 2.97% | 2.82% | 2.86% | 2.78% | 2.31% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.12% | 2.43% | 1.90% | 1.76% | 1.77% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.11% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPS and VDC have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPS has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to VDC (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPS dropped -35.93% vs VDC's -34.24%.
On 10-year performance, VDC leads with 7.94% vs 4.43% for RSPS. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 5.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VDC has performed better with a 7.94% return vs 4.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPS.
RSPS has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 2.11% for VDC.
RSPS tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Staples -SEC, while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPS and 0.09% for VDC.
VDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPS and VDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer