PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSP vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSP vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSP achieves a 11.61% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 7.94% return. Over the past 10 years, RSP has underperformed VUG with an annualized return of 12.18%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.30% annualized return.


RSP

1D
0.58%
1M
5.62%
YTD
11.61%
6M
10.84%
1Y
22.05%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
12.18%

VUG

1D
2.81%
1M
0.27%
YTD
7.94%
6M
9.17%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
24.04%
5Y*
14.43%
10Y*
18.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSP vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
11.61%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%29.41%12.66%28.91%-7.84%18.52%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
7.94%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between RSP and VUG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between RSP and VUG has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RSP vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSP
VUG

Technology

20.9%
53.5%

Industrials

14.2%
3.6%

Financial Services

13.9%
4.3%

Healthcare

11.1%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
1.5%

Real Estate

6.1%
1.0%

Utilities

5.7%
0.9%

Energy

4.0%
0.4%

Basic Materials

3.9%
0.6%

Communication Services

3.9%
17.3%

Technology

RSP
20.9%
VUG
53.5%

Industrials

RSP
14.2%
VUG
3.6%

Financial Services

RSP
13.9%
VUG
4.3%

Healthcare

RSP
11.1%
VUG
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

RSP
10.0%
VUG
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

RSP
6.4%
VUG
1.5%

Real Estate

RSP
6.1%
VUG
1.0%

Utilities

RSP
5.7%
VUG
0.9%

Energy

RSP
4.0%
VUG
0.4%

Basic Materials

RSP
3.9%
VUG
0.6%

Communication Services

RSP
3.9%
VUG
17.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSP vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSP vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.28

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

1.60

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.69

5.50

+5.19

RSP vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSP Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSP and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSP vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSP drawdown since its inception was -59.92%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSP and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.92%

-50.68%

-9.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-16.53%

+8.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.81%

-22.85%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

-35.61%

+14.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

-35.61%

-3.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.90%

+2.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-7.09%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

4.79%

-2.72%

Volatility

RSP vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is 3.59%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 6.32%. This indicates that RSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

6.32%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.58%

13.28%

-4.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.79%

16.65%

-4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.23%

22.34%

-6.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.37%

21.51%

-3.14%

RSP vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RSP vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than VUG's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.46%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.38%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSP and VUG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VUG has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to RSP (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSP dropped -59.92% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 10-year performance, VUG leads with 18.30% vs 12.18% for RSP. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VUG has performed better with a 18.30% return vs 12.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for RSP.

RSP has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.38% for VUG.

RSP is categorized as S&P 500, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSP and 0.03% for VUG.

RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSP and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer