RSMV vs. TAGS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RSMV (Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF) and TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RSMV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while TAGS is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium TAGS Index. RSMV is actively managed, while TAGS is passively managed. Over the past year, RSMV returned 25.51% vs -2.42% for TAGS. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. RSMV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for TAGS.

Performance

RSMV vs. TAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSMV achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than TAGS's 4.80% return.

RSMV

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 6.55%
• YTD: 9.21%
• 6M: 9.78%
• 1Y: 25.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TAGS

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: -5.66%
• YTD: 4.80%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: -2.42%
• 3Y*: -7.37%
• 5Y*: -1.75%
• 10Y*: -1.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSMV vs. TAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	9.21%	11.08%
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund	4.80%	-9.74%

Correlation

The correlation between RSMV and TAGS is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025	-0.02

RSMV vs. TAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSMV	TAGS
Technology	34.7%	-
Financial Services	33.9%	99.9%
Consumer Defensive	9.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	-
Communication Services	5.1%	-
Energy	5.0%	-
Utilities	2.8%	-
Industrials	2.8%	-
Basic Materials	2.6%	-
Healthcare	2.5%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

RSMV vs. TAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSMV

RSMV Risk / Return Rank: 68
RSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
RSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
RSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 63
RSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
RSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 73

TAGS

TAGS Risk / Return Rank: 7
TAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
TAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
TAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 7
TAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
TAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSMV vs. TAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSMV	TAGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	-0.19	+2.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	-0.19	+3.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	0.98	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	-0.24	+3.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.47	-0.41	+13.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSMV vs. TAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSMV Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the TAGS Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSMV and TAGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSMV	TAGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	-0.19	+2.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	-0.23	+1.27

Drawdowns

RSMV vs. TAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSMV drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, smaller than the maximum TAGS drawdown of -76.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMV and TAGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSMV	TAGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.58%	-76.40%	+58.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.27%	-10.07%	+2.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-33.59%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.60%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-64.14%	+63.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.96%	-57.23%	+53.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.90%	5.90%	-4.00%

Volatility

RSMV vs. TAGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) is 4.39%, while Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that RSMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSMV	TAGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.39%	5.55%	-1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.67%	10.18%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.94%	12.63%	-0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.52%	16.57%	-2.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.52%	18.04%	-3.52%

RSMV vs. TAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSMV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TAGS's 0.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSMV vs. TAGS - Dividend Comparison

RSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while TAGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF	0.92%	1.00%
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSMV and TAGS in my portfolio?

RSMV and TAGS have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSMV or TAGS?

TAGS has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to RSMV (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSMV dropped -17.58% vs TAGS's -76.40%.

Which ETF is better, RSMV or TAGS?

On 1-year performance, RSMV leads with 25.51% vs -2.42% for TAGS. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, RSMV has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSMV or TAGS?

Over the 1-year period, RSMV has performed better with a 25.51% return vs -2.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSMV or TAGS?

TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RSMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSMV or TAGS?

RSMV has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for TAGS.

What is the main difference between RSMV and TAGS?

RSMV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TAGS is Agricultural Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RSMV and 0.21% for TAGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.