PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSI vs. FN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RSI vs. FN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) and Fabrinet (FN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSI achieves a 38.50% return, which is significantly higher than FN's -4.36% return.


RSI

1D
0.56%
1M
-13.92%
6M
52.29%
YTD
38.50%
1Y
33.48%
3Y*
91.20%
5Y*
22.26%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.83%

FN

1D
-0.89%
1M
-20.43%
6M
-11.04%
YTD
-4.36%
1Y
34.50%
3Y*
52.15%
5Y*
35.73%
10Y*
28.66%
ALL TIME*
25.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$369.31M$374.33M$584.37M
$95.94M$82.72M$81.03M

RSI vs. FN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RSI
Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
38.50%41.62%205.57%25.07%-78.24%-23.79%125.05%
FN
Fabrinet
-4.36%107.06%15.53%48.44%8.23%52.69%24.06%

Correlation

The correlation between RSI and FN is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2020

0.31

The correlation between RSI and FN shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RSI:

$6.66B

FN:

$15.60B

EPS

RSI:

$0.64

FN:

$11.64

PE Ratio

RSI:

42.26

FN:

37.40

PEG Ratio

RSI:

0.08

FN:

1.60

PS Ratio

RSI:

2.07

FN:

3.72

PB Ratio

RSI:

16.16

FN:

6.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

RSI:

$1.37B

FN:

$4.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RSI:

$478.00M

FN:

$509.75M

EBITDA (TTM)

RSI:

$213.86M

FN:

$422.55M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSI vs. FN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSI
RSI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSI Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
RSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FN
FN Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FN Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FN Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSI vs. FN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) and Fabrinet (FN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSIFNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.14

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

0.78

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.57

2.36

+0.21

RSI vs. FN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the FN Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSI and FN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSI vs. FN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSI drawdown since its inception was -88.92%, which is greater than FN's maximum drawdown of -70.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSI and FN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSIFNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.92%

-70.46%

-18.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.47%

-44.47%

+15.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.04%

-44.47%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.88%

-44.47%

-42.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.05%

-41.67%

+19.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.27%

-22.65%

-26.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.08%

14.68%

-1.60%

Volatility

RSI vs. FN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) is 18.30%, while Fabrinet (FN) has a volatility of 20.97%. This indicates that RSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSIFNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.30%

20.97%

-2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.18%

58.26%

-22.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.99%

71.07%

-16.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.21%

54.89%

+7.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.54%

48.81%

+11.73%

Dividends

RSI vs. FN - Dividend Comparison

Neither RSI nor FN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

RSI vs. FN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rush Street Interactive, Inc. and Fabrinet. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

RSI vs. FN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rush Street Interactive, Inc. and Fabrinet over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

RSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported a gross profit of 139.66M and revenue of 393.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.5%.

FN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.

RSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported an operating income of 46.23M and revenue of 393.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.

FN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

RSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported a net income of 46.44M and revenue of 393.78M, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.

FN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RSI and FN have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FN has higher volatility (20.97%) compared to RSI (18.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSI dropped -88.92% vs FN's -70.46%.

RSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSI and FN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer