RSI vs. AAT
RSI (Rush Street Interactive, Inc.) and AAT (American Assets Trust, Inc.) are both stocks. RSI operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical), while AAT operates in REIT - Diversified (Real Estate). Over the past 5 years, RSI returned 13.91%/yr vs -4.39%/yr for AAT. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RSI vs. AAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSI achieves a 30.88% return, which is significantly higher than AAT's 25.44% return.
RSI
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -10.24%
- YTD
- 30.88%
- 6M
- 36.21%
- 1Y
- 102.63%
- 3Y*
- 99.56%
- 5Y*
- 13.91%
- 10Y*
- —
AAT
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 12.32%
- YTD
- 25.44%
- 6M
- 24.32%
- 1Y
- 23.64%
- 3Y*
- 12.86%
- 5Y*
- -4.39%
- 10Y*
- -1.65%
RSI vs. AAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSI Rush Street Interactive, Inc. | 30.88% | 41.62% | 205.57% | 25.07% | -78.24% | -23.79% | 125.05% |
AAT American Assets Trust, Inc. | 25.44% | -22.96% | 23.32% | -9.58% | -26.36% | 34.03% | 13.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSI and AAT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
RSI:
$2.72B
AAT:
$1.79B
RSI:
$0.54
AAT:
$0.29
RSI:
47.34
AAT:
80.01
RSI:
0.08
AAT:
3.68
RSI:
2.07
AAT:
4.09
RSI:
17.08
AAT:
1.67
RSI:
$1.24B
AAT:
$438.19M
RSI:
$433.41M
AAT:
$266.23M
RSI:
$162.04M
AAT:
$231.92M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSI vs. AAT — Risk / Return Rank
RSI
AAT
RSI vs. AAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) and American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSI | AAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.01 | 0.98 | +1.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.87 | 1.41 | +1.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.19 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 1.81 | +1.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.85 | 3.67 | +4.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSI | AAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 0.98 | +1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | -0.16 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.15 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
RSI vs. AAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSI drawdown since its inception was -88.92%, which is greater than AAT's maximum drawdown of -61.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSI and AAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSI | AAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.92% | -61.85% | -27.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.47% | -13.97% | -15.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.04% | -38.02% | -4.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.88% | -56.18% | -30.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.82% | -34.81% | +21.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.49% | -20.15% | -30.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.79% | 6.89% | +5.90% |
Volatility
RSI vs. AAT - Volatility Comparison
Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) has a higher volatility of 11.30% compared to American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT) at 6.36%. This indicates that RSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSI | AAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.30% | 6.36% | +4.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.03% | 16.47% | +15.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.39% | 24.19% | +27.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.95% | 28.05% | +33.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.68% | 31.10% | +29.58% |
Dividends
RSI vs. AAT - Dividend Comparison
RSI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAT American Assets Trust, Inc. | 5.83% | 7.18% | 5.10% | 5.86% | 4.83% | 3.09% | 3.46% | 2.48% | 2.71% | 2.75% | 2.34% | 2.47% |
RSI Rush Street Interactive, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RSI vs. AAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rush Street Interactive, Inc. and American Assets Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RSI vs. AAT - Profitability Comparison
RSI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported a gross profit of 132.17M and revenue of 370.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.7%.
AAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Assets Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 66.93M and revenue of 110.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.5%.
RSI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported an operating income of 42.78M and revenue of 370.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.
AAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Assets Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 25.83M and revenue of 110.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.
RSI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported a net income of 26.21M and revenue of 370.36M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
AAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Assets Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 5.13M and revenue of 110.59M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RSI and AAT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSI has higher volatility (11.30%) compared to AAT (6.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSI dropped -88.92% vs AAT's -61.85%.
RSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSI and AAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer