RSI vs. AAT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) and American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT).

Performance

RSI vs. AAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) and American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RSI vs. AAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RSI Rush Street Interactive, Inc.	12.92%	41.62%	205.57%	25.07%	-78.24%	-23.79%	125.05%
AAT American Assets Trust, Inc.	-1.38%	-22.96%	23.32%	-9.58%	-26.36%	34.03%	13.23%

Fundamentals

Market Cap RSI : $2.34B AAT : $1.41B
EPS RSI : $0.48 AAT : $0.73
PE Ratio RSI : 45.97 AAT : 25.31
PEG Ratio RSI : 0.08 AAT : 1.16
PS Ratio RSI : 1.91 AAT : 3.23
PB Ratio RSI : 15.89 AAT : 1.29
Total Revenue (TTM) RSI : $1.13B AAT : $436.20M
Gross Profit (TTM) RSI : $392.76M AAT : $266.61M
EBITDA (TTM) RSI : $137.70M AAT : $228.28M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSI achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly higher than AAT's -1.38% return.

RSI

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 9.97%
• YTD: 12.92%
• 6M: 9.43%
• 1Y: 99.64%
• 3Y*: 91.79%
• 5Y*: 5.81%
• 10Y*: —

AAT

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -5.04%
• YTD: -1.38%
• 6M: -6.54%
• 1Y: -2.12%
• 3Y*: 6.00%
• 5Y*: -6.21%
• 10Y*: -3.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RSI vs. AAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSI

RSI Risk / Return Rank: 88
RSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
RSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
RSI Omega Ratio Rank: 87
RSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
RSI Martin Ratio Rank: 85

AAT

AAT Risk / Return Rank: 33
AAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
AAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
AAT Omega Ratio Rank: 30
AAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
AAT Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSI vs. AAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) and American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSI	AAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	-0.08	+2.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	0.07	+2.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.01	+0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.55	-0.16	+3.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.25	-0.34	+8.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSI vs. AAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the AAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSI and AAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSI	AAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	-0.08	+2.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09	-0.22	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.10	+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between RSI and AAT is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RSI vs. AAT - Dividend Comparison

RSI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSI Rush Street Interactive, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AAT American Assets Trust, Inc.	7.41%	7.18%	5.10%	5.86%	4.83%	3.09%	3.46%	2.48%	2.71%	2.75%	2.34%	2.47%

Drawdowns

RSI vs. AAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSI drawdown since its inception was -88.92%, which is greater than AAT's maximum drawdown of -61.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSI and AAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSI	AAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.92%	-61.85%	-27.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.47%	-15.25%	-14.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-86.88%	-56.18%	-30.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.83%	-48.75%	+35.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.70%	-19.91%	-31.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.69%	7.34%	+5.35%

Volatility

RSI vs. AAT - Volatility Comparison

Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) has a higher volatility of 10.56% compared to American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT) at 6.44%. This indicates that RSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSI	AAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.56%	6.44%	+4.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.03%	16.18%	+17.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.36%	26.22%	+24.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.99%	28.01%	+33.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.88%	31.02%	+29.86%

Financials

RSI vs. AAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rush Street Interactive, Inc. and American Assets Trust, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported a gross profit of 111.73M and revenue of 324.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.4%.

AAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, American Assets Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 65.42M and revenue of 110.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.4%.

RSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported an operating income of 28.71M and revenue of 324.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

AAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, American Assets Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.22M and revenue of 110.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

RSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported a net income of 19.14M and revenue of 324.89M, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.

AAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, American Assets Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 3.15M and revenue of 110.09M, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.