RSI vs. ACEL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RSI (Rush Street Interactive, Inc.) and ACEL (Accel Entertainment, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gambling industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 5 years, RSI returned 13.91%/yr vs -1.50%/yr for ACEL. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RSI vs. ACEL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) and Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSI achieves a 30.88% return, which is significantly higher than ACEL's 5.17% return.

RSI

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -10.24%
• YTD: 30.88%
• 6M: 36.21%
• 1Y: 102.63%
• 3Y*: 99.56%
• 5Y*: 13.91%
• 10Y*: —

ACEL

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: -3.46%
• YTD: 5.17%
• 6M: 15.83%
• 1Y: 6.76%
• 3Y*: 7.50%
• 5Y*: -1.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSI vs. ACEL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RSI Rush Street Interactive, Inc.	30.88%	41.62%	205.57%	25.07%	-78.24%	-23.79%	125.05%
ACEL Accel Entertainment, Inc.	5.17%	6.84%	3.99%	33.38%	-40.86%	28.91%	16.09%

Correlation

The correlation between RSI and ACEL is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020	0.37

Fundamentals

Market Cap RSI : $2.72B ACEL : $1.01B
EPS RSI : $0.54 ACEL : $0.60
PE Ratio RSI : 47.34 ACEL : 20.01
PEG Ratio RSI : 0.08 ACEL : 0.61
PS Ratio RSI : 2.07 ACEL : 0.76
PB Ratio RSI : 17.08 ACEL : 3.71
Total Revenue (TTM) RSI : $1.24B ACEL : $1.36B
Gross Profit (TTM) RSI : $433.41M ACEL : $432.42M
EBITDA (TTM) RSI : $162.04M ACEL : $178.48M

Return for Risk

RSI vs. ACEL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSI

RSI Risk / Return Rank: 85
RSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
RSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
RSI Omega Ratio Rank: 86
RSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
RSI Martin Ratio Rank: 83

ACEL

ACEL Risk / Return Rank: 45
ACEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
ACEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
ACEL Omega Ratio Rank: 43
ACEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
ACEL Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSI vs. ACEL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) and Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSI	ACEL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	0.19	+1.82
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	0.52	+2.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.08	+0.30
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	0.27	+3.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.85	0.51	+7.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSI vs. ACEL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSI Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the ACEL Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSI and ACEL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSI	ACEL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01	0.19	+1.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	-0.04	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.03	+0.25

Drawdowns

RSI vs. ACEL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSI drawdown since its inception was -88.92%, which is greater than ACEL's maximum drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSI and ACEL.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSI	ACEL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.92%	-57.83%	-31.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.47%	-26.02%	-3.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.04%	-26.02%	-16.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-86.88%	-47.08%	-39.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.82%	-17.53%	+4.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.49%	-24.24%	-26.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.79%	13.64%	-0.85%

Volatility

RSI vs. ACEL - Volatility Comparison

Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) and Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL) have volatilities of 11.30% and 11.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSI	ACEL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.30%	11.20%	+0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.03%	26.41%	+5.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.39%	36.01%	+15.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.95%	35.44%	+26.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.68%	43.95%	+16.73%

Dividends

RSI vs. ACEL - Dividend Comparison

Neither RSI nor ACEL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

RSI vs. ACEL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rush Street Interactive, Inc. and Accel Entertainment, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported a gross profit of 132.17M and revenue of 370.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.7%.

ACEL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accel Entertainment, Inc. reported a gross profit of 109.94M and revenue of 351.56M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.

RSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported an operating income of 42.78M and revenue of 370.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

ACEL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accel Entertainment, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.08M and revenue of 351.56M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.

RSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported a net income of 26.21M and revenue of 370.36M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.

ACEL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Accel Entertainment, Inc. reported a net income of 14.67M and revenue of 351.56M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSI and ACEL in my portfolio?

RSI and ACEL have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSI or ACEL?

RSI has higher volatility (11.30%) compared to ACEL (11.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSI dropped -88.92% vs ACEL's -57.83%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.