FN vs. CLS

In the year-to-date period, FN achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 43.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FN has outperformed CLS with an annualized return of 30.51%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively lower 27.25% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fabrinet (FN) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FN Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FN and CLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither FN nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FN drawdown since its inception was -70.46%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FN and CLS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Fabrinet (FN) is 30.84%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 42.04%. This indicates that FN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fabrinet and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.