FN vs. JBL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fabrinet (FN) and Jabil Inc. (JBL).

Performance

FN vs. JBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fabrinet (FN) and Jabil Inc. (JBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FN vs. JBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FN Fabrinet	14.55%	107.06%	15.53%	48.44%	8.23%	52.69%	19.66%	26.37%	78.78%	-28.78%
JBL Jabil Inc.	16.53%	58.73%	13.25%	87.43%	-2.55%	66.40%	3.89%	68.49%	-4.41%	12.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap FN : $18.87B JBL : $28.58B
EPS FN : $10.36 JBL : $7.41
PE Ratio FN : 50.35 JBL : 35.84
PEG Ratio FN : 2.16 JBL : 1.92
PS Ratio FN : 4.84 JBL : 0.89
PB Ratio FN : 8.64 JBL : 21.27
Total Revenue (TTM) FN : $3.89B JBL : $32.67B
Gross Profit (TTM) FN : $467.60M JBL : $2.95B
EBITDA (TTM) FN : $458.04M JBL : $1.55B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FN achieves a 14.55% return, which is significantly lower than JBL's 16.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FN having a 32.12% annualized return and JBL not far behind at 31.03%.

FN

• 1D: 6.03%
• 1M: -4.42%
• YTD: 14.55%
• 6M: 43.03%
• 1Y: 164.05%
• 3Y*: 63.76%
• 5Y*: 41.68%
• 10Y*: 32.12%

JBL

• 1D: 7.33%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 16.53%
• 6M: 22.40%
• 1Y: 95.52%
• 3Y*: 44.77%
• 5Y*: 38.54%
• 10Y*: 31.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FN vs. JBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FN

FN Risk / Return Rank: 93
FN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FN Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FN Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FN Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
FN Martin Ratio Rank: 97

JBL

JBL Risk / Return Rank: 92
JBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
JBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
JBL Omega Ratio Rank: 89
JBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
JBL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FN vs. JBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fabrinet (FN) and Jabil Inc. (JBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FN	JBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	2.22	+0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	2.67	0.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.38	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.07	5.35	+2.72
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.16	13.82	+6.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FN vs. JBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FN Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the JBL Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FN and JBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FN	JBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	2.22	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	1.05	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.85	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.35	+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between FN and JBL is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FN vs. JBL - Dividend Comparison

FN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FN Fabrinet	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JBL Jabil Inc.	0.12%	0.14%	0.22%	0.25%	0.47%	0.45%	0.75%	0.77%	1.29%	1.22%	1.35%	1.37%

Drawdowns

FN vs. JBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FN drawdown since its inception was -70.46%, smaller than the maximum JBL drawdown of -94.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FN and JBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FN	JBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.46%	-94.92%	+24.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.55%	-17.86%	-2.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.70%	-36.83%	-1.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.11%	-57.34%	+6.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.34%	-6.22%	-9.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.78%	-44.75%	+21.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.23%	6.92%	+1.31%

Volatility

FN vs. JBL - Volatility Comparison

Fabrinet (FN) has a higher volatility of 28.70% compared to Jabil Inc. (JBL) at 16.40%. This indicates that FN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FN	JBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.70%	16.40%	+12.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.83%	31.13%	+19.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.21%	43.17%	+22.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.79%	37.03%	+14.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.40%	36.68%	+10.72%

Financials

FN vs. JBL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fabrinet and Jabil Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 137.68M and revenue of 1.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.2%.

JBL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jabil Inc. reported a gross profit of 746.00M and revenue of 8.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.0%.

FN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 114.40M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

JBL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jabil Inc. reported an operating income of 374.00M and revenue of 8.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

FN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 112.63M and revenue of 1.13B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.

JBL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Jabil Inc. reported a net income of 223.00M and revenue of 8.28B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.