PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FN vs. KE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FN vs. KE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fabrinet (FN) and Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FN achieves a 59.24% return, which is significantly higher than KE's -6.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FN has outperformed KE with an annualized return of 34.71%, while KE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.62% annualized return.


FN

1D
3.41%
1M
1.00%
YTD
59.24%
6M
62.08%
1Y
202.25%
3Y*
84.79%
5Y*
50.58%
10Y*
34.71%

KE

1D
-2.99%
1M
-3.46%
YTD
-6.72%
6M
-11.13%
1Y
39.14%
3Y*
0.77%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
8.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FN vs. KE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FN
Fabrinet
59.24%107.06%15.53%48.44%8.23%52.69%19.66%26.37%78.78%-28.78%
KE
Kimball Electronics, Inc.
-6.72%48.53%-30.50%19.30%3.81%36.09%-8.89%13.30%-15.12%0.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FN and KE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2014

0.41

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FN:

$26.26B

KE:

$639.62M

EPS

FN:

$11.65

KE:

$1.05

PE Ratio

FN:

62.25

KE:

24.74

PS Ratio

FN:

6.19

KE:

0.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

FN:

$4.24B

KE:

$1.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FN:

$509.75M

KE:

$115.15M

EBITDA (TTM)

FN:

$422.55M

KE:

$77.66M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FN vs. KE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FN
FN Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FN Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FN Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

KE
KE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
KE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
KE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
KE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
KE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FN vs. KE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fabrinet (FN) and Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNKEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.12

0.81

+2.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.07

1.31

+1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.20

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.90

1.24

+8.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.13

2.46

+21.67

FN vs. KE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FN Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is higher than the KE Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FN and KE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNKEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12

0.81

+2.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.09

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.22

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.29

+0.32

Drawdowns

FN vs. KE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FN drawdown since its inception was -70.46%, which is greater than KE's maximum drawdown of -58.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FN and KE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNKEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.46%

-58.50%

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.55%

-31.69%

+11.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.47%

-58.50%

+21.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.70%

-58.50%

+19.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.11%

-58.50%

+7.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-21.67%

+18.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.59%

-23.82%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.42%

15.94%

-7.52%

Volatility

FN vs. KE - Volatility Comparison

Fabrinet (FN) has a higher volatility of 24.65% compared to Kimball Electronics, Inc. (KE) at 14.39%. This indicates that FN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNKEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.65%

14.39%

+10.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.16%

39.74%

+14.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.29%

48.49%

+16.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.25%

40.73%

+12.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.08%

39.71%

+8.37%

Dividends

FN vs. KE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FN nor KE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FN vs. KE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fabrinet and Kimball Electronics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
1.21B
352.92M
(FN) Total Revenue
(KE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FN vs. KE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fabrinet and Kimball Electronics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

6.0%8.0%10.0%12.0%20222023202420252026
11.9%
7.9%
Portfolio components
FN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.

KE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimball Electronics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 27.82M and revenue of 352.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.9%.

FN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

KE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimball Electronics, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.76M and revenue of 352.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.

FN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

KE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimball Electronics, Inc. reported a net income of 5.72M and revenue of 352.92M, resulting in a net margin of 1.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FN and KE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FN has higher volatility (24.65%) compared to KE (14.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FN dropped -70.46% vs KE's -58.50%.

FN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FN and KE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer