PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSI vs. MGM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RSI vs. MGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) and MGM Resorts International (MGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RSI having a 30.83% return and MGM slightly higher at 32.37%.


RSI

1D
-0.04%
1M
-8.40%
YTD
30.83%
6M
36.15%
1Y
101.91%
3Y*
99.53%
5Y*
14.09%
10Y*

MGM

1D
-0.12%
1M
26.31%
YTD
32.37%
6M
35.90%
1Y
51.13%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
2.47%
10Y*
7.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSI vs. MGM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RSI
Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
30.83%41.62%205.57%25.07%-78.24%-23.79%125.05%
MGM
MGM Resorts International
32.37%5.31%-22.45%33.25%-25.27%42.47%128.73%

Correlation

The correlation between RSI and MGM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.44

The correlation between RSI and MGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RSI:

$2.72B

MGM:

$12.50B

EPS

RSI:

$0.54

MGM:

$0.68

PE Ratio

RSI:

47.32

MGM:

70.79

PEG Ratio

RSI:

0.08

MGM:

0.79

PS Ratio

RSI:

2.06

MGM:

0.73

PB Ratio

RSI:

17.07

MGM:

5.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

RSI:

$1.24B

MGM:

$17.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RSI:

$433.41M

MGM:

$5.83B

EBITDA (TTM)

RSI:

$162.04M

MGM:

$1.37B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSI vs. MGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSI
RSI Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSI Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

MGM
MGM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
MGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSI vs. MGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) and MGM Resorts International (MGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSIMGMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

1.26

+0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.86

2.14

+0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.25

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

2.26

+1.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.98

4.85

+3.13

RSI vs. MGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the MGM Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSI and MGM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSIMGMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.26

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.06

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.16

+0.12

Drawdowns

RSI vs. MGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSI drawdown since its inception was -88.92%, smaller than the maximum MGM drawdown of -98.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSI and MGM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSIMGMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.92%

-98.11%

+9.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.47%

-22.76%

-6.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.04%

-49.33%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.88%

-49.33%

-37.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.86%

-48.74%

+35.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.47%

-46.42%

-4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.82%

10.56%

+2.26%

Volatility

RSI vs. MGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) is 11.19%, while MGM Resorts International (MGM) has a volatility of 19.23%. This indicates that RSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSIMGMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.19%

19.23%

-8.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.03%

31.58%

+0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.37%

40.70%

+10.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.95%

40.46%

+21.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.66%

45.82%

+14.84%

Dividends

RSI vs. MGM - Dividend Comparison

Neither RSI nor MGM has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MGM
MGM Resorts International
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.02%0.50%1.56%1.98%1.32%
RSI
Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RSI vs. MGM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rush Street Interactive, Inc. and MGM Resorts International. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
370.36M
4.45B
(RSI) Total Revenue
(MGM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RSI vs. MGM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rush Street Interactive, Inc. and MGM Resorts International over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
35.7%
0
Portfolio components
RSI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported a gross profit of 132.17M and revenue of 370.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.7%.

MGM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MGM Resorts International reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

RSI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported an operating income of 42.78M and revenue of 370.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

MGM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MGM Resorts International reported an operating income of 301.24M and revenue of 4.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

RSI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. reported a net income of 26.21M and revenue of 370.36M, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.

MGM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MGM Resorts International reported a net income of 125.14M and revenue of 4.45B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RSI and MGM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGM has higher volatility (19.23%) compared to RSI (11.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSI dropped -88.92% vs MGM's -98.11%.

RSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSI and MGM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer