FN vs. UNH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FN (Fabrinet) and UNH (UnitedHealth Group Incorporated) are both stocks. FN operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while UNH operates in Healthcare Plans (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, FN returned 34.71%/yr vs 12.49%/yr for UNH. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FN vs. UNH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fabrinet (FN) and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FN achieves a 59.24% return, which is significantly higher than UNH's 15.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FN has outperformed UNH with an annualized return of 34.71%, while UNH has yielded a comparatively lower 12.49% annualized return.

FN

• 1D: 3.41%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: 59.24%
• 6M: 62.08%
• 1Y: 202.25%
• 3Y*: 84.79%
• 5Y*: 50.58%
• 10Y*: 34.71%

UNH

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: 15.09%
• 6M: 12.59%
• 1Y: 28.69%
• 3Y*: -7.15%
• 5Y*: 0.25%
• 10Y*: 12.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FN vs. UNH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FN Fabrinet	59.24%	107.06%	15.53%	48.44%	8.23%	52.69%	19.66%	26.37%	78.78%	-28.78%
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated	15.09%	-33.14%	-2.41%	0.80%	6.94%	45.20%	21.25%	20.00%	14.52%	39.83%

Correlation

The correlation between FN and UNH is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2010	0.20

The correlation between FN and UNH shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (3 years) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap FN : $26.26B UNH : $343.07B
EPS FN : $11.65 UNH : $13.23
PE Ratio FN : 62.25 UNH : 28.50
PS Ratio FN : 6.19 UNH : 0.76
PB Ratio FN : 11.39 UNH : 3.30
Total Revenue (TTM) FN : $4.24B UNH : $449.71B
Gross Profit (TTM) FN : $509.75M UNH : $84.55B
EBITDA (TTM) FN : $422.55M UNH : $22.99B

Return for Risk

FN vs. UNH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FN

FN Risk / Return Rank: 93
FN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FN Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FN Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FN Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FN Martin Ratio Rank: 96

UNH

UNH Risk / Return Rank: 61
UNH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
UNH Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
UNH Omega Ratio Rank: 61
UNH Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
UNH Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FN vs. UNH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fabrinet (FN) and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FN	UNH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.12	0.72	+2.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	1.17	+1.90
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.18	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.90	1.00	+8.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	24.13	2.18	+21.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FN vs. UNH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FN Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is higher than the UNH Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FN and UNH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FN	UNH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.12	0.72	+2.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96	0.01	+0.95
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.42	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.63	-0.02

Drawdowns

FN vs. UNH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FN drawdown since its inception was -70.46%, smaller than the maximum UNH drawdown of -74.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FN and UNH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FN	UNH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.46%	-74.37%	+3.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.55%	-28.96%	+8.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.47%	-61.39%	+23.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.70%	-61.39%	+22.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.11%	-61.39%	+10.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.88%	-37.50%	+34.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.59%	-14.76%	-7.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.42%	13.19%	-4.77%

Volatility

FN vs. UNH - Volatility Comparison

Fabrinet (FN) has a higher volatility of 24.65% compared to UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) at 6.91%. This indicates that FN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FN	UNH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.65%	6.91%	+17.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.16%	30.81%	+23.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.29%	39.86%	+25.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.25%	31.78%	+21.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.08%	30.15%	+17.93%

Dividends

FN vs. UNH - Dividend Comparison

FN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UNH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FN Fabrinet	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UNH UnitedHealth Group Incorporated	2.34%	2.64%	1.62%	1.38%	1.21%	1.12%	1.38%	1.41%	1.38%	1.30%	1.48%	1.59%

Financials

FN vs. UNH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fabrinet and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.

UNH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated reported a gross profit of 25.41B and revenue of 111.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.7%.

FN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

UNH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated reported an operating income of 8.99B and revenue of 111.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.

FN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

UNH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UnitedHealth Group Incorporated reported a net income of 6.28B and revenue of 111.72B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FN and UNH in my portfolio?

FN and UNH have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FN or UNH?

FN has higher volatility (24.65%) compared to UNH (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FN dropped -70.46% vs UNH's -74.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.