RPG vs. MEME
RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. RPG is passively managed, while MEME is actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RPG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.
Performance
RPG vs. MEME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPG achieves a 31.51% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 79.03% return.
RPG
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 11.54%
- YTD
- 31.51%
- 6M
- 32.14%
- 1Y
- 41.04%
- 3Y*
- 28.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- 14.81%
MEME
- 1D
- -5.29%
- 1M
- 25.28%
- YTD
- 79.03%
- 6M
- 68.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RPG vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 31.51% | -3.43% |
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 79.03% | -36.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPG and MEME is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.69 |
RPG vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RPG
MEME
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
RPG
MEME
Industrials
RPG
MEME
Consumer Cyclical
RPG
MEME
-
Communication Services
RPG
MEME
Healthcare
RPG
MEME
Financial Services
RPG
MEME
Basic Materials
RPG
MEME
Energy
RPG
MEME
Utilities
RPG
MEME
Real Estate
RPG
MEME
-
Consumer Defensive
RPG
MEME
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPG vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank
RPG
MEME
RPG vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPG | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPG | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.28 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
RPG vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPG drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, which is greater than MEME's maximum drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPG and MEME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPG | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.27% | -48.78% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.93% | +5.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -29.90% | +21.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | — | — |
Volatility
RPG vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPG | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.73% | 74.19% | -54.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 74.19% | -50.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 74.19% | -51.49% |
RPG vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPG vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison
RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF | 0.17% | 0.24% | 0.25% | 1.44% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.83% | 0.47% | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPG and MEME have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RPG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RPG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.
RPG has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPG and 0.69% for MEME.
Find the right allocation for RPG and MEME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer