RPFGX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
RPFGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on May 1, 1991. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
RPFGX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RPFGX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPFGX Davis Financial Fund | -11.14% | 29.28% | 29.54% | 15.60% | -8.91% | 31.45% | -5.87% | 26.51% | -11.74% | 19.24% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPFGX achieves a -11.14% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, RPFGX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 11.80%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
RPFGX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -7.67%
- YTD
- -11.14%
- 6M
- -4.05%
- 1Y
- 10.90%
- 3Y*
- 21.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.80%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RPFGX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPFGX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RPFGX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
RPFGX
FASGX
RPFGX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPFGX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 1.21 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | 1.73 | -0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.26 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | 1.55 | -0.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.14 | 6.89 | -4.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPFGX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 1.21 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.53 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.70 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.60 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between RPFGX and FASGX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RPFGX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
RPFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPFGX Davis Financial Fund | 4.48% | 3.98% | 4.19% | 6.96% | 3.41% | 6.60% | 5.60% | 7.96% | 8.93% | 2.32% | 1.68% | 2.26% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
RPFGX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPFGX drawdown since its inception was -67.11%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPFGX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPFGX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.11% | -47.35% | -19.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.54% | -9.07% | -5.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.86% | -23.54% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | -27.20% | -18.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.90% | -7.95% | -5.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -6.74% | -3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | 2.04% | +2.45% |
Volatility
RPFGX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) is 4.09%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that RPFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RPFGX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 4.57% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 7.78% | +3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 12.82% | +6.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 12.14% | +7.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 12.56% | +9.72% |