PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPFGX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPFGX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPFGX achieves a 3.49% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, RPFGX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 13.12%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


RPFGX

1D
0.06%
1M
1.03%
6M
4.89%
YTD
3.49%
1Y
19.21%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*
13.12%
ALL TIME*
12.29%

VOO

1D
0.71%
1M
0.26%
6M
8.58%
YTD
10.16%
1Y
21.58%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
15.14%
ALL TIME*
14.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$3.82B$3.78B$5.44B

RPFGX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPFGX
Davis Financial Fund
3.49%29.28%29.54%15.60%-8.91%31.45%-5.87%26.51%-11.74%19.24%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.16%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between RPFGX and VOO is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between RPFGX and VOO has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPFGX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RPFGX
RPFGX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
RPFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
RPFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RPFGX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RPFGXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.28

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

2.21

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.91

9.44

-6.52

RPFGX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPFGX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPFGX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPFGX drawdown since its inception was -67.11%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPFGX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPFGXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.11%

-33.99%

-33.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-8.90%

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-18.69%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.86%

-24.52%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.24%

-33.99%

-11.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-1.38%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-3.67%

-6.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.58%

2.08%

+3.50%

Volatility

RPFGX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.54%. This indicates that RPFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPFGXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

3.54%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.76%

10.10%

+1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

12.82%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.10%

16.93%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.21%

18.01%

+4.20%

RPFGX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPFGX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPFGX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

RPFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than VOO's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RPFGX
Davis Financial Fund
3.84%3.98%4.19%6.96%3.41%6.60%5.60%7.96%8.93%2.32%1.68%2.26%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPFGX and VOO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RPFGX has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to VOO (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPFGX dropped -67.11% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPFGX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer