PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPFGX vs. FIDSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPFGX vs. FIDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPFGX achieves a 3.49% return, which is significantly lower than FIDSX's 9.69% return. Over the past 10 years, RPFGX has underperformed FIDSX with an annualized return of 13.12%, while FIDSX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.82% annualized return.


RPFGX

1D
0.06%
1M
1.03%
6M
4.89%
YTD
3.49%
1Y
19.21%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*
13.12%
ALL TIME*
12.29%

FIDSX

1D
0.88%
1M
2.98%
6M
9.41%
YTD
9.69%
1Y
13.60%
3Y*
20.56%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
13.82%
ALL TIME*
11.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RPFGX vs. FIDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RPFGX
Davis Financial Fund
3.49%29.28%29.54%15.60%-8.91%31.45%-5.87%26.51%-11.74%19.24%
FIDSX
Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio
9.69%9.33%32.82%14.53%-8.19%33.13%1.22%34.25%-16.13%20.92%

Correlation

The correlation between RPFGX and FIDSX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 1991

0.92

The correlation between RPFGX and FIDSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPFGX vs. FIDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RPFGX
RPFGX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
RPFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
RPFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

FIDSX
FIDSX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
FIDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RPFGX vs. FIDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RPFGXFIDSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.12

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

0.63

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.91

1.53

+1.38

RPFGX vs. FIDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the FIDSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPFGX and FIDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RPFGX vs. FIDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPFGX drawdown since its inception was -67.11%, smaller than the maximum FIDSX drawdown of -74.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPFGX and FIDSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPFGXFIDSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.11%

-74.26%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-16.60%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.30%

-19.44%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.86%

-24.49%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.24%

-45.48%

+0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-0.80%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-13.91%

+4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.58%

6.86%

-1.28%

Volatility

RPFGX vs. FIDSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) is 4.21%, while Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that RPFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPFGXFIDSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

4.85%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.76%

12.28%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

17.23%

-2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.10%

20.65%

-1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.21%

23.65%

-1.44%

RPFGX vs. FIDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPFGX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDSX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPFGX vs. FIDSX - Dividend Comparison

RPFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than FIDSX's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIDSX
Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio
1.32%1.70%6.03%3.01%11.32%4.12%5.86%5.57%12.89%4.22%1.00%0.70%
RPFGX
Davis Financial Fund
3.84%3.98%4.19%6.96%3.41%6.60%5.60%7.96%8.93%2.32%1.68%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, RPFGX and FIDSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FIDSX has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to RPFGX (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPFGX dropped -67.11% vs FIDSX's -74.26%.

RPFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPFGX and FIDSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer