RPFGX vs. FIDSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX).
RPFGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on May 1, 1991. FIDSX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 10, 1981.
Performance
RPFGX vs. FIDSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RPFGX vs. FIDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPFGX Davis Financial Fund | -11.14% | 29.28% | 29.54% | 15.60% | -8.91% | 31.45% | -5.87% | 26.51% | -11.74% | 19.24% |
FIDSX Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio | -9.46% | 9.33% | 27.56% | 14.53% | -8.19% | 33.13% | 1.22% | 34.25% | -16.13% | 20.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPFGX achieves a -11.14% return, which is significantly lower than FIDSX's -9.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RPFGX having a 11.80% annualized return and FIDSX not far behind at 11.65%.
RPFGX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -7.67%
- YTD
- -11.14%
- 6M
- -4.05%
- 1Y
- 10.90%
- 3Y*
- 21.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.83%
- 10Y*
- 11.80%
FIDSX
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- -9.46%
- 6M
- -10.80%
- 1Y
- -0.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RPFGX vs. FIDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPFGX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDSX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RPFGX vs. FIDSX — Risk / Return Rank
RPFGX
FIDSX
RPFGX vs. FIDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPFGX | FIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 0.00 | +0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | 0.15 | +0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.02 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.66 | -0.15 | +0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.14 | -0.41 | +2.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPFGX | FIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 0.00 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.40 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.49 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.47 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between RPFGX and FIDSX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RPFGX vs. FIDSX - Dividend Comparison
RPFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than FIDSX's 1.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPFGX Davis Financial Fund | 4.48% | 3.98% | 4.19% | 6.96% | 3.41% | 6.60% | 5.60% | 7.96% | 8.93% | 2.32% | 1.68% | 2.26% |
FIDSX Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio | 1.88% | 1.70% | 1.86% | 3.01% | 11.32% | 4.12% | 5.86% | 5.57% | 12.89% | 4.22% | 1.00% | 0.70% |
Drawdowns
RPFGX vs. FIDSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPFGX drawdown since its inception was -67.11%, smaller than the maximum FIDSX drawdown of -74.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPFGX and FIDSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPFGX | FIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.11% | -74.26% | +7.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.54% | -16.60% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.86% | -24.49% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | -45.48% | +0.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.90% | -15.78% | +1.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -14.00% | +4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | 5.96% | -1.47% |
Volatility
RPFGX vs. FIDSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) is 4.09%, while Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that RPFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RPFGX | FIDSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 4.53% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 13.73% | -2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 21.95% | -2.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.26% | 20.95% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 23.68% | -1.40% |