RPFGX vs. FIKBX
RPFGX (Davis Financial Fund) and FIKBX (Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z) are both Financials Equities funds from BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, RPFGX returned 13.84%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for FIKBX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. RPFGX charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for FIKBX.
Performance
RPFGX vs. FIKBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPFGX achieves a 3.49% return, which is significantly lower than FIKBX's 9.88% return.
RPFGX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 4.89%
- YTD
- 3.49%
- 1Y
- 19.21%
- 3Y*
- 22.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.29%
FIKBX
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- 19.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.85%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
RPFGX Davis Financial Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
RPFGX vs. FIKBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPFGX Davis Financial Fund | 3.49% | 29.28% | 29.54% | 15.60% | -8.91% | 31.45% | -5.87% | 26.51% | -10.57% |
FIKBX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z | 9.88% | 15.36% | 32.80% | 14.47% | -8.58% | 33.43% | 0.18% | 34.31% | -11.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPFGX and FIKBX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018 | 0.96 |
The correlation between RPFGX and FIKBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPFGX vs. FIKBX — Risk / Return Rank
RPFGX
FIKBX
RPFGX vs. FIKBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RPFGX | FIKBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.12 | 1.29 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.91 | 3.72 | -0.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RPFGX vs. FIKBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPFGX drawdown since its inception was -67.11%, which is greater than FIKBX's maximum drawdown of -45.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPFGX and FIKBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPFGX | FIKBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.11% | -45.95% | -21.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.54% | -12.96% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.30% | -19.38% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.86% | -24.82% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | -0.74% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.83% | -7.96% | -1.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.58% | 4.50% | +1.08% |
Volatility
RPFGX vs. FIKBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Davis Financial Fund (RPFGX) is 4.21%, while Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z (FIKBX) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that RPFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIKBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPFGX | FIKBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 4.83% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.76% | 12.27% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.14% | 16.19% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 20.54% | -1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.21% | 25.76% | -3.55% |
RPFGX vs. FIKBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPFGX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKBX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPFGX vs. FIKBX - Dividend Comparison
RPFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than FIKBX's 6.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIKBX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class Z | 6.47% | 7.11% | 5.04% | 2.48% | 6.20% | 4.43% | 2.78% | 1.59% | 4.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RPFGX Davis Financial Fund | 3.84% | 3.98% | 4.19% | 6.96% | 3.41% | 6.60% | 5.60% | 7.96% | 8.93% | 2.32% | 1.68% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, RPFGX and FIKBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FIKBX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to RPFGX (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPFGX dropped -67.11% vs FIKBX's -45.95%.
RPFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPFGX and FIKBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer