RPAR vs. NTSI
RPAR (RPAR Risk Parity ETF) and NTSI (WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RPAR returned 0.20%/yr vs 6.05%/yr for NTSI. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RPAR charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for NTSI.
Performance
RPAR vs. NTSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPAR achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than NTSI's 9.43% return.
RPAR
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- 6M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 1Y
- 11.54%
- 3Y*
- 7.20%
- 5Y*
- 0.20%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.72%
NTSI
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 22.08%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $609.63K | $573.09K | $1.10M | |
| $342.76K | $300.17K | $486.62K |
RPAR vs. NTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF | 2.65% | 17.91% | 0.06% | 6.03% | -22.82% | 8.40% |
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund | 9.43% | 30.37% | 1.11% | 15.42% | -19.27% | 2.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPAR and NTSI is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021 | 0.73 |
The correlation between RPAR and NTSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPAR vs. NTSI — Risk / Return Rank
RPAR
NTSI
RPAR vs. NTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RPAR | NTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.26 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.86 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.68 | 6.68 | -2.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RPAR vs. NTSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPAR drawdown since its inception was -30.16%, smaller than the maximum NTSI drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPAR and NTSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPAR | NTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.16% | -34.01% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.10% | -12.33% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.26% | -13.22% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.16% | -34.01% | +3.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.05% | -0.89% | -6.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.46% | -8.96% | -2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 3.43% | -0.16% |
Volatility
RPAR vs. NTSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) is 2.71%, while WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that RPAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPAR | NTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | 4.60% | -1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.90% | 13.55% | -4.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.56% | 15.57% | -5.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.50% | 15.86% | -3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.65% | 15.66% | -3.01% |
RPAR vs. NTSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPAR has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSI's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPAR vs. NTSI - Dividend Comparison
RPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than NTSI's 3.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSI WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund | 3.48% | 3.65% | 2.92% | 2.35% | 2.66% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF | 2.45% | 2.55% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 4.01% | 2.02% | 0.76% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPAR and NTSI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTSI has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to RPAR (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPAR dropped -30.16% vs NTSI's -34.01%.
On 5-year performance, NTSI leads with 6.05% vs 0.20% for RPAR. On fees, NTSI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, RPAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NTSI has performed better with a 6.05% return vs 0.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NTSI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for RPAR.
NTSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 2.45% for RPAR.
They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for RPAR and 0.26% for NTSI.
NTSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPAR and NTSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer