PortfoliosLab logo
RPAR vs. AOM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between RPAR and AOM is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

RPAR vs. AOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.54%
25.21%
RPAR
AOM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

RPAR:

0.30

AOM:

0.88

Sortino Ratio

RPAR:

0.54

AOM:

1.33

Omega Ratio

RPAR:

1.07

AOM:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

RPAR:

0.19

AOM:

1.14

Martin Ratio

RPAR:

0.83

AOM:

4.73

Ulcer Index

RPAR:

4.83%

AOM:

1.57%

Daily Std Dev

RPAR:

11.74%

AOM:

8.31%

Max Drawdown

RPAR:

-30.16%

AOM:

-19.96%

Current Drawdown

RPAR:

-16.22%

AOM:

-1.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPAR achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly higher than AOM's 1.88% return.


RPAR

YTD

4.05%

1M

2.83%

6M

-1.44%

1Y

3.53%

5Y*

1.51%

10Y*

N/A

AOM

YTD

1.88%

1M

2.21%

6M

0.51%

1Y

7.26%

5Y*

5.31%

10Y*

4.68%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RPAR vs. AOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPAR has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than AOM's 0.25% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

RPAR vs. AOM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPAR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RPAR is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RPAR is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RPAR is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RPAR is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RPAR is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RPAR is 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

AOM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AOM is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AOM is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AOM is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AOM is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AOM is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AOM is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

RPAR vs. AOM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current RPAR Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the AOM Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPAR and AOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.30
0.88
RPAR
AOM

Dividends

RPAR vs. AOM - Dividend Comparison

RPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than AOM's 3.12% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
2.60%2.52%3.15%4.01%2.03%0.76%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AOM
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF
3.12%3.10%2.79%2.27%1.56%2.02%2.66%2.53%3.31%2.14%1.98%2.08%

Drawdowns

RPAR vs. AOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPAR drawdown since its inception was -30.16%, which is greater than AOM's maximum drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPAR and AOM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-16.22%
-1.01%
RPAR
AOM

Volatility

RPAR vs. AOM - Volatility Comparison

RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) at 3.16%. This indicates that RPAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
4.14%
3.16%
RPAR
AOM